The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial resistance genes in marine bacteria from salmon aquaculture and non‐aquaculture sites
Abstract
Summary: Antimicrobial resistance ( AR ) detected by disc diffusion and antimicrobial resistance genes detected by DNA hybridization and polymerase chain reaction with amplicon sequencing were studied in 124 marine bacterial isolates from a C hilean salmon aquaculture site and 76 from a site without aquaculture 8 km distant. Resistance to one or more antimicrobials was present in 81% of the isolates regardless of site. Resistance to tetracycline was most commonly encoded by tetA and tetG ; to trimethoprim, by dfrA1, dfrA5 and dfrA12 ; to sulfamethizole, by sul1 and sul2 ; to amoxicillin, by bla TEM ; and to streptomycin, by strA‐strB . Integron integrase intl1 was detected in 14 sul1 ‐positive isolates, associated with aad9 gene cassettes in two from the aquaculture site. intl2 Integrase was only detected in three dfrA1 ‐positive isolates from the aquaculture site and was not associated with gene cassettes in any. Of nine isolates tested for conjugation, two from the aquaculture site transferred AR determinants to E scherichia coli . High levels of AR in marine sediments from aquaculture and non‐aquaculture sites suggest that dispersion of the large amounts of antimicrobials used in Chilean salmon aquaculture has created selective pressure in areas of the marine environment far removed from the initial site of use of these agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
Levy, S. B., FitzGerald, G. B., & Macone, A. B. (1976) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197609092951103 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, S. Q. A., Cabello, F. C., L'Abée‐Lund, T. M., Tomova, A., Godfrey, H. P., Buschmann, A. H., & Sørum, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1310-1320
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2137373171
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.