Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Network succession reveals the importance of competition in response to emulsified vegetable oil amendment for uranium bioremediation

Open access
Deng, Ye, Zhang, Ping, Qin, Yujia, Tu, Qichao, Yang, Yunfeng, He, Zhili, Schadt, Christopher Warren, Zhou, Jizhong·2016·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Discerning network interactions among different species/populations in microbial communities has evoked substantial interests in recent years, but little information is available about temporal dynamics of microbial network interactions in response to environmental perturbations. Here, we modified the random matrix theory‐based network approach to discern network succession in groundwater microbial communities in response to emulsified vegetable oil ( EVO ) amendment for uranium bioremediation. Groundwater microbial communities from one control and seven monitor wells were analysed with a functional gene array ( GeoChip 3.0), and functional molecular ecological networks ( fMENs ) at different time points were reconstructed. Our results showed that the network interactions were dramatically altered by EVO amendment. Dynamic and resilient succession was evident: fairly simple at the initial stage (Day 0), increasingly complex at the middle period (Days 4, 17, 31), most complex at Day 80, and then decreasingly complex at a later stage (140–269 days). Unlike previous studies in other habitats, negative interactions predominated in a time‐series fMEN , suggesting strong competition among different microbial species in the groundwater systems after EVO injection. Particularly, several keystone sulfate‐reducing bacteria showed strong negative interactions with their network neighbours. These results provide mechanistic understanding of the decreased phylogenetic diversity during environmental perturbations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1462-2920.12981

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Deng, Y., Zhang, P., Qin, Y., Tu, Q., Yang, Y., He, Z., Schadt, C. W., & Zhou, J.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-11
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
205-218
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W1601221684
Cited by
465
References
60
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network succession reveals the importance of competition in response to emulsified vegetable oil amendment for uranium bioremediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.12981
The paper
Deng, Y., Zhang, P., Qin, Y., Tu, Q., Yang, Y., He, Z., Schadt, C. W., & Zhou, J. (2016). Network succession reveals the importance of competition in response to emulsified vegetable oil amendment for uranium bioremediation. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12981

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.