The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network succession reveals the importance of competition in response to emulsified vegetable oil amendment for uranium bioremediation
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Discerning network interactions among different species/populations in microbial communities has evoked substantial interests in recent years, but little information is available about temporal dynamics of microbial network interactions in response to environmental perturbations. Here, we modified the random matrix theory‐based network approach to discern network succession in groundwater microbial communities in response to emulsified vegetable oil ( EVO ) amendment for uranium bioremediation. Groundwater microbial communities from one control and seven monitor wells were analysed with a functional gene array ( GeoChip 3.0), and functional molecular ecological networks ( fMENs ) at different time points were reconstructed. Our results showed that the network interactions were dramatically altered by EVO amendment. Dynamic and resilient succession was evident: fairly simple at the initial stage (Day 0), increasingly complex at the middle period (Days 4, 17, 31), most complex at Day 80, and then decreasingly complex at a later stage (140–269 days). Unlike previous studies in other habitats, negative interactions predominated in a time‐series fMEN , suggesting strong competition among different microbial species in the groundwater systems after EVO injection. Particularly, several keystone sulfate‐reducing bacteria showed strong negative interactions with their network neighbours. These results provide mechanistic understanding of the decreased phylogenetic diversity during environmental perturbations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11234 · Cited by 11,726
Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization
Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1272 · Cited by 7,903
Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J. P., Hector, A., Hooper, D. U., Huston, M. A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064088 · Cited by 4,649
Microbial interactions: from networks to models
Faust, K., & Raes, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832 · Cited by 4,141
Detecting Novel Associations in Large Data Sets
Reshef, D. N., Reshef, Y. A., Finucane, H. K., Grossman, S. R., McVean, G., Turnbaugh, P. J., Lander, E. S., Mitzenmacher, M., & Sabeti, P. C. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205438 · Cited by 3,339
Molecular ecological network analyses
Deng, Y., Jiang, Y.-H., Yang, Y., He, Z., Luo, F., & Zhou, J. (2012) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-113 · Cited by 3,196
Self-citationInferring Correlation Networks from Genomic Survey Data
Friedman, J., & Alm, E. J. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002687 · Cited by 2,706
The modularity of pollination networks
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L., & Jordano, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706375104 · Cited by 2,639
Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness
Watts, D. J. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691188331 · Cited by 2,105
Cited by
A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity
Ning, D., Deng, Y., Tiedje, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904623116 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationBiodiversity and species competition regulate the resilience of microbial biofilm community
Feng, K., Zhang, Z., Cai, W., Liu, W., Xu, M., Yin, H., Wang, A., He, Z., & Deng, Y. (2017) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14356 · Cited by 474
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, Y., Zhang, P., Qin, Y., Tu, Q., Yang, Y., He, Z., Schadt, C. W., & Zhou, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-218
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1601221684
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network succession reveals the importance of competition in response to emulsified vegetable oil amendment for uranium bioremediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.12981
- The paper
- Deng, Y., Zhang, P., Qin, Y., Tu, Q., Yang, Y., He, Z., Schadt, C. W., & Zhou, J. (2016). Network succession reveals the importance of competition in response to emulsified vegetable oil amendment for uranium bioremediation. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12981
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.