The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Motivation, Cognition, and Action: An Analysis of Studies of Task Goals and Knowledge
Abstract
This paper begins by analysing the nature of cognition and of motivation, especially as they relate to the operation of the subconscious. The interdependence of cognition and motivation is demonstrated. This interdependence is then illustrated through an analysis of studies on goal setting and task strategies (task knowledge) in relation to task performance. Three types of relationships have been found: direct, separate effects of goals and strategies; interactions between goals and strategies (moderation); and the mediation of goal effects by strategies. It is argued that there is really one underlying model that accounts for all of these findings. There are two paths to performance, one motivated by goals and another motivated by other factors. Each is or can be associated with relevant task knowledge. ‘Direct’ goal effects occur when the subjects already possess relevant task knowledge, but that knowledge is not measured. (If it were measured, there would be mediation.) Direct strategy effects occur when subjects are motivated to discover or use relevant strategies by (unmeasured) motives that are not a product of the performance goal. Moderation occurs when there is no task knowledge tied to the goals but knowledge derives from other sources, which combines with goals to produce performance. Mediation occurs when goals produce measured task knowledge, which, when controlled, vitiates the goal effect. This model suggests ideas for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766
Self-citationCultural variation and the psychological contract
Thomas, D. C., Au, K., & Ravlin, E. C. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.209 · Cited by 251
The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on performance effectiveness in a MBA program.
Brown, T. C., & Latham, G. P. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/h0087266 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Locke, E.
- Venue
- Applied Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 408-429
- ISSN
- 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0597
- OpenAlex
- W2048343052
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motivation, Cognition, and Action: An Analysis of Studies of Task Goals and Knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1464-0597.00023
- The paper
- Locke, E. (2000). Motivation, Cognition, and Action: An Analysis of Studies of Task Goals and Knowledge. Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.