The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Resource Strategy and Competitive Advantage: A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Consultancies
Abstract
Concepts associated with the resource‐based view of the firm are increasingly finding their way into the strategic HRM debate. Drawing on this literature, this paper reports one of the first industry‐based, longitudinal investigations into the relationship between human resource strategy and competitive advantage. Set in New Zealand, but in an internationally oriented sector, the study examines one of the more neglected spheres of professional services: engineering consultancies. The results indicate that the consultancy firms that survived the major business traumas of the late 1980s and early 1990s adopted similar structural, competitive, operational and HR responses associated with their evolving ‘industry recipe’. In interpreting the relationship between HRM and firm performance, then, it is important to distinguish those features of a firm's HRM which are strategic to ongoing viability from those that might form the basis of a relatively enduring form of competitive advantage. While there is insufficient evidence to conclude that any of the primary subjects in this study have established an enviable form of superiority, the study suggests that opportunities do exist for professional service firms to develop industry leadership through superior HRM. The analysis has implications for the wider work of theory‐building in strategic HRM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research
Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x · Cited by 1,538
Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research
Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.55 · Cited by 1,316
Strategic human resource management: where have we come from and where should we be going?
Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2000) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00037 · Cited by 453
Self-citationDeconstructing AMO framework: a systematic review
Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Martinez Tomas, J. (2016) · Intangible Capital · doi:10.3926/ic.838 · Cited by 283
Overcoming human capital voids in underdeveloped countries
Wang, S. L., & Cuervo‐Cazurra, A. (2017) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1144 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Boxall, P., & Steeneveld, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-463
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2015732596
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Resource Strategy and Competitive Advantage: A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Consultancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-6486.00144
- The paper
- Boxall, P., & Steeneveld, M. (1999). Human Resource Strategy and Competitive Advantage: A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Consultancies. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.