The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge‐Intensive Companies
Abstract
This paper treats the significance of organization‐based social identity for loyalty versus exit reactions with special reference to knowledge‐intensive companies. The centrality of network relations and close contact with clients in combination with the sometimes drastic consequences of knowledge workers defecting in many knowledge‐intensive companies makes social identification and loyalty crucial themes for management. The paper discusses different kinds of and modes of accomplishing loyalty and also addresses post‐exit management, how companies may deal with employees that have left the company.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review
Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1661837 · Cited by 425
Satisfaction with HR practices and commitment to the organisation: why one size does not fit all
Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Purcell, J., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2005) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00293.x · Cited by 343
O'Neill, B. S., & Adya, M. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710745969 · Cited by 173
(2013) · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvesson, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1101-1124
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2154542338
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
