The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows
Abstract
This paper considers the relationship between the stocks and flows of learning across levels in an overall organizational learning system. A survey instrument based on the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (SLAM) was administered to 15 individuals representing senior‐, middle‐ and non‐management levels from each of 32 organizations, resulting in a total sample of 480 respondents. This research supports the premise that there is a positive relationship between the stocks of learning at all levels and business performance. Furthermore, the proposition that the misalignment of stocks and flows in an overall organizational learning system is negatively associated with business performance is also supported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146
Cited by
Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital
Bontis, N. (2001) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00053 · Cited by 1,689
Self-citationAlliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement
Schilke, O., & Goerzen, A. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310362102 · Cited by 449
Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review
Basten, D., & Haamann, T. (2018) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244018794224 · Cited by 282
Ritz, W., Wolf, M., & McQuitty, S. (2019) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-04-2018-0062 · Cited by 219
Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: mediator, moderator, and interplay
Mu, J., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2011) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00650.x · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 437-469
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2047159813
- Cited by
- 1,267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
