The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primitive Ideas: Protected Area Buffer Zones and the Politics of Land in Africa
Abstract
This article critically evaluates participatory, integrated conservation and development programmes in Africa, focusing on protected area buffer zones. I argue that, despite the emphasis on participation and benefit‐sharing, many of the new projects replicate more coercive forms of conservation practice and often constitute an expansion of state authority into remote rural areas. I suggest that the reasons for this state of affairs can be traced in part to the persistence in conservation interventions of Western ideas and images of the Other. These stereotypes result in misguided assumptions in conservation programmes which have important implications for the politics of land in buffer zone communities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In his analysis of the everincreasing area designated for protection in eastern Africa, he raises the critique that such extensions consolidate and extend state control over land, shifting resource control away from local people.”
From Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation (2015) · cites this paper as Neumann, 1997
In the citing paper
“With over 10% of territory in some African countries dedicated to conservation and managed by international organizations, he argues that such patterns merit critical attention in light of histories of colonialism and continuing questions of sovereignty facing postcolonial states”
From Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation (2015) · cites this paper as Neumann, 1997
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation
Harris, L. M., & Hazen, H. D. (2015) · ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies · doi:10.14288/acme.v4i1.730 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Neumann, R.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 559-582
- ISSN
- 0012-155X
- 1467-7660
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primitive Ideas: Protected Area Buffer Zones and the Politics of Land in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-7660.00054
- The paper
- Neumann, R. (1997). Primitive Ideas: Protected Area Buffer Zones and the Politics of Land in Africa. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00054