The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Information and Communication Technologies for Direct Poverty Alleviation: Costs and Benefits
Open accessAbstract
Information and communications technologies (ICTs) are powerful tools for empowerment and income generation in developing countries. The cost‐effectiveness of different ICTs does vary between developed and less developed countries, however. This article reviews the potential efficacy of radio, telephony and the Internet as tools of direct poverty alleviation in the latter. While the requirements for their successful utilisation make radio and telephone far more suitable technologies for the poor, traditional ICTs can act as a sustainable intermediary for them to gain indirect access to the power of the Internet. Governments should concentrate on opening up private and community provision of broadcasting and widening access to telephone services, so that they can effectively play this intermediary role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World: A Review of the Literature
Donner, J. (2008) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240802019970 · Cited by 743
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenny, C.
- Venue
- Development Policy Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-157
- ISSN
- 0950-6764 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7679
- OpenAlex
- W2137756968
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information and Communication Technologies for Direct Poverty Alleviation: Costs and Benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-7679.00162
- The paper
- Kenny, C. (2002). Information and Communication Technologies for Direct Poverty Alleviation: Costs and Benefits. Development Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
