Cited by 213Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural Innovations and PracticesEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetically Modified Crops, Corporate Pricing Strategies, and Farmers' Adoption: The Case of Bt Cotton in Argentina

Qaim, Matin, de Janvry, Alain·2003·American Journal of Agricultural Economics

DOI 10.1111/1467-8276.00490

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article analyzes adoption and impacts of Bt cotton in Argentina against the background of monopoly pricing. Based on survey data, it is shown that the technology significantly reduces insecticide applications and increases yields; however, these advantages are curbed by the high price charged for genetically modified seeds. Using the contingent valuation method, it is shown that farmers' average willingness to pay is less than half the actual technology price. A lower price would not only increase benefits for growers, but could also multiply company profits, thus, resulting in a Pareto improvement. Implications of the sub‐optimal pricing strategy are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8276.00490

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation
Hanemann, M., Loomis, J., & Kanninen, B. (1991) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/1242453 · Cited by 1,824
Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities
Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. J., & Williams, M. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1017 · Cited by 1,468
Estimating the Demand for a New Technology: Bt Cotton and Insecticide Policies
Hubbell, B., Marra, M. C., & Carlson, G. A. (2000) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/0002-9092.00010 · Cited by 720
Global review of commercialized transgenic crops
James, C. (2003) · Cited by 507
Five years of Bt cotton in China – the benefits continue
Pray, C. E., Huang, J., Hu, R., & Rozelle, S. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01401.x · Cited by 479
STOCHASTIC STRUCTURE, FARM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN DEVELOPING AGRICULTURE
Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1983) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041598 · Cited by 376
Surplus Distribution from the Introduction of a Biotechnology Innovation
Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., Traxler, G., & Nelson, R. G. (2000) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/0002-9092.00031 · Cited by 274
Intellectual Property Rights and the Welfare Effects of Agricultural R…D
Moschini, G., & Lapan, H. E. (1997) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/1244280 · Cited by 213
Roundup ready� soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex
Moschini, G., Lapan, H. E., & Sobolevsky, A. (2000) · Agribusiness · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(200024)16:1 · Cited by 199

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

ASA, 2001, Superficie Sembrada con Cultivares Transgénicos en Argentina
Elena M.G., 2001, Ventajas Económicas del Algodón Transgénico en Argentina
GAO, 2000, Information on Prices of Genetically Modified Seeds in the United States and Argentina
Gianessi L.P., 2002, Plant Biotechnology: Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in US Agriculture; An Analysis of 40 Case Studies
James C., 2002, ISAAA Briefs 26
Pellegrino L., 2001, La Producción Algodonera Argentina en los Últimos Años y la Campaña Algodonera 2000/01
Poisson J., 2001, Mejoramiento del Algodón en Argentina
SAGPYA, 2000, Estudio de la Cadena Nacional Agroindustrial Algodón de la República Argentina
Traxler G., 2001, Transgenic Cotton in Mexico: Economic and Environmental Impacts

Sorted by citations

The economics of genetically modified crops
Qaim, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144203 · Cited by 465
Self-citation
As You Sow, So Shall You Reap: The Welfare Impacts of Contract Farming
Bellemare, M. F. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.008 · Cited by 440
World Soybean Production: Area Harvested, Yield, and Long-Term Projections
Masuda, T., & Goldsmith, P. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.92573 · Cited by 299
Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Waddington, H. S., Snilstveit, B., Hombrados, J. G., Vojtkova, M., Phillips, D., Davies, P. R., & White, H. (2014) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.4073/csr.2014.6 · Cited by 269
Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects
Qaim, M., & de Janvry, A. (2005) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x04001883 · Cited by 173
Self-citation
The Role of Farming Experience on the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies: Evidence from Smallholder Farmers in Uganda
Ainembabazi, J. H., & Mugisha, J. (2014) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2013.874556 · Cited by 160
Village-wide Effects of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Bt Cotton in India
Subramanian, A., & Qaim, M. (2008) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.010 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries
Raney, T. L. (2006) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.009 · Cited by 117
Economic and agronomic impact of commercialized GM crops: a meta-analysis
AREAL, F. J., RIESGO, L., & RODRÍGUEZ-CEREZO, E. (2013) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859612000111 · Cited by 112
Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: household income, nutrition, and health
Qaim, M. (2010) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.07.009 · Cited by 111
Self-citation
Adoption and Impact of Hybrid Wheat in India
Matuschke, I., Mishra, R. R., & Qaim, M. (2007) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.005 · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Farm-Level Economic Performance of Genetically Modified Cotton in Maharashtra, India
Bennett, R. M., Kambhampati, U. S., Morse, S., & Ismael, Y. (2005) · Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00273.x · Cited by 108
Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies
Olum, S., Gellynck, X., Juvinal, J., Ongeng, D., & Steur, H. D. (2019) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/0030727019879453 · Cited by 105
Consumer Acceptance of Second‐Generation GM Foods: The Case of Biofortified Cassava in the North‐east of Brazil
González, C., Johnson, N. L., & Qaim, M. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00219.x · Cited by 103
Self-citation
The willingness to adopt agro-ecological innovations: Application of choice modelling to Caribbean banana planters
Blazy, J., Carpentier, A., & Thomas, A. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.021 · Cited by 105
Forecasting the Adoption of GM Oilseed Rape: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany
Breustedt, G., Müller‐Scheeßel, J., & Latacz‐Lohmann, U. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00147.x · Cited by 86
Bt-cotton and secondary pests
Wang, S., Just, D. R., & Andersen, P. P. (2008) · International Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbt.2008.018348 · Cited by 84
Snipping around for food: economic, ethical and policy implications of CRISPR/Cas genome editing
Bartkowski, B., Theesfeld, I., Pirscher, F., & Timaeus, J. (2018) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.07.017 · Cited by 81
Smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for scale-appropriate farm mechanization: Evidence from the mid-hills of Nepal
Paudel, G. P., Dilli Bahadur, K. C., Rahut, D. B., Khanal, N. P., Justice, S. E., & McDonald, A. J. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101196 · Cited by 80
Estimating the adoption of Bt eggplant in India: Who Benefits from public–private partnership?
Krishna, V. V., & Qaim, M. (2007) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.002 · Cited by 80
Self-citation
What drives smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya
Channa, H., Chen, A. Z., Pina, P., Ricker-Gilbert, J. E., & Stein, D. (2019) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.03.005 · Cited by 74
Bt Cotton in India: Development of Benefits and the Role of Government Seed Price Interventions
Sadashivappa, P., & Qaim, M. (2009) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops
Noack, F., Engist, D., Gantois, J., Gaur, V., Hyjazie, B. F., Larsen, A., M’Gonigle, L. K., Missirian, A., Qaim, M., Sargent, R. D., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado9340 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
The evolving rights to intellectual property protection in the agricultural biosciences
Wright, B. D., & Pardey, P. G. (2006) · International Journal of Technology and Globalisation · doi:10.1504/ijtg.2006.009124 · Cited by 68
A Primer for Using Transgenic Insecticidal Cotton in Developing Countries
Showalter, A. M., Heuberger, S., Tabashnik, B. E., & Carrière, Y. (2009) · Journal of Insect Science · doi:10.1673/031.009.2201 · Cited by 67
A trait‐based model of the potential demand for a genetically engineered food crop in a developing economy
Edmeades, S., & Smale, M. (2006) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00167.x · Cited by 60
A methodology to assess the profitability of Bt-cotton: case study results from the state of Karnataka, India
Pemsl, D. E., Waibel, H., & Orphal, J. (2004) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2004.05.011 · Cited by 60
Agricultural Biotechnology Adoption in Developing Countries
Qaim, M. (2005) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00825.x · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Fifteen Years of Bt Cotton in China: The Economic Impact and its Dynamics
Qiao, F. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.01.011 · Cited by 53
Enhancing Sustainability of Cotton Production Systems in West Africa: A Summary of Empirical Evidence from Burkina Faso
Vitale, J. D., Ouattarra, M., & Vognan, G. (2011) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su3081136 · Cited by 54
Tarnishing Silver Bullets: Bt Technology Adoption, Bounded Rationality and the Outbreak of Secondary Pest Infestations in ChinaPreprint
Just, D. R., Wang, S., & Pinstrup‐Andersen, P. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.21230 · Cited by 48
The potential benefits of herbicide-resistant transgenic rice in Uruguay: Lessons for small developing countries
Hareau, G., Mills, B. F., & Norton, G. W. (2005) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.10.005 · Cited by 47
Pro-poor agricultural biotechnology: Can the international research system deliver the goods?
Spielman, D. J. (2006) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.05.002 · Cited by 45
Ex Ante Impact Assessment under Imperfect Information: Biotechnology in New Member States of the EU
Demont, M., Cerovska, M., Daems, W., Dillen, K., Fogarasi, J., Mathijs, E., Muška, F., Soukup, J., & Tollens, E. F. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00157.x · Cited by 43
Economic Impacts of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) Cotton
Tokel, D., Erkencioglu, B. N., & Özyiğit, İ. İ. (2021) · Journal of Natural Fibers · doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1870613 · Cited by 42
Agronomics and Sustainability of Transgenic Cotton in Argentina
Qaim, M., Eugenio, J. M. A., & de Janvry, A. (2003) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Farmer Knowledge and Risk Analysis: Postrelease Evaluation of Herbicide‐Tolerant Canola in Western Canada
Mauro, I. J., & McLachlan, S. M. (2008) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01027.x · Cited by 40
Ex ante analysis of the benefits of transgenic drought tolerance research on cereal crops in low‐income countries
Kostandini, G., Mills, B. F., Omamo, S. W., & Wood, S. (2009) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00392.x · Cited by 37
Determinants of Corn Rootworm Resistant Corn Adoption in Indiana
Alexander, C. E., & van Mellor, T. (2005) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 37
Global capture of crop biotechnology in developing world over a decade
Adenle, A. A. (2011) · Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jgeb.2011.08.003 · Cited by 37
Parables: applied economics literature about the impact of genetically engineered crop varieties in developing economies
Smale, M., Zambrano, P., Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., & Gruère, G. (2006) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.55412 · Cited by 36
The Limits of Intellectual Property Rights: Lessons from the Spread of Illegal Transgenic Seeds in IndiaPreprint
Lalitha, N., Pray, E., & Ramaswami, B. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 35
The Spread of Illegal Transgenic Cotton Varieties in India: Biosafety Regulation, Monopoly, and Enforcement
Ramaswami, B., Pray, C. E., & Lalitha, N. (2011) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.007 · Cited by 33
Tribolium castaneum as a Model for High-Throughput RNAi Screening
Knorr, E., Bingsohn, L., Kanost, M. R., & Vilcinskas, A. (2013) · Advances in biochemical engineering, biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2013_208 · Cited by 32
Economic and Social Considerations in the Adoption of Bt Crops
Qaim, M., Pray, C. E., & Zilberman, D. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8373-0_12 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
The GMO experience in North and South America
Traxler, G. (2006) · International Journal of Technology and Globalisation · doi:10.1504/ijtg.2006.009126 · Cited by 30
Limits to biofortification: farmer perspectives on a vitamin A enriched Banana in Uganda
Schnurr, M. A., Addison, L., & Mujabi-Mujuzi, S. (2018) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1534834 · Cited by 28
Long-term impact of Bt cotton: An empirical evidence from North India
Peshin, R., Hansra, B. S., Singh, K., Nanda, R., Sharma, R., Yangsdon, S., & Kumar, R. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127575 · Cited by 27
Adoption of GM technology in livestock production chains: an integrating framework
Novoselova, T. A., Meuwissen, M. P. M., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2006) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2006.12.005 · Cited by 28
Bales and Balance: A Review of the Methods Used to Assess the Economic Impact of Bt Cotton on Farmers in Developing Economies
Smale, M., Zambrano, P., & Cartel, M. A. (2006) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 28
On the Adoption of Genetically Modified Seeds in Developing Countries and the Optimal Types of Government Intervention
Basu, A. K., & Qaim, M. (2007) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01005.x · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Adoption of genetically-modified seeds in Taiwan
Luh, Y., Jiang, W.-J., & Chien, Y.-N. (2014) · China Agricultural Economic Review · doi:10.1108/caer-03-2013-0037 · Cited by 27
Micronutrient malnutrition and the impact of modern plant breeding on public health in India: How cost-effective is biofortification?
Stein, A. J. (2006) · University writing server of the University of Hohenheim (Universität Hohenheim) · Cited by 27
Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-stakeholder analysis
Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., Alimirzaei, E., & Azadi, H. (2016) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-016-9879-3 · Cited by 25
Perception and Attitude toward GM Technology among Agribusiness Managers in China as Producers and as Consumers
Deng, H., Hu, R., Pray, C. E., & Jin, Y. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051342 · Cited by 25
Adoption and Impact of the First GM Crop Introduced in EU Agriculture: Bt Maize in Spain
Manuel, G. B., & Rodríguez‐Cerezo, E. (2008) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · Cited by 25
FAO International Technical Conference Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries: Options and opportunities in crops, forestry, livestock, fisheries and agro-industry to face the challenges of food insecurity and climate change (ABDC-10)
Ruane, J., Lidder, P., Jones, K., Mooney, P. R., Sanvido, O., Tuberosa, R., Preissing, J., Ghosh, K., Guimarães, E. P., Monard, A., et al. (2010) · Cited by 24
The influence of Bt cotton cultivation on the structure and functions of the soil bacterial community by soil metagenomics
Lv, N., Liu, Y., Guo, T., Liang, P., Li, R., Liang, P., & Gao, X. (2022) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113452 · Cited by 23
Rotational grazing adoption in cattle production under a cost‐share agreement: does uncertainty have a role in conservation technology adoption?
Kim, S., Gillespie, J., & Paudel, K. P. (2008) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00434.x · Cited by 23
Targeting Technology to Reduce Poverty and Conserve Resources: Experimental Delivery of Laser Land Leveling to Farmers in Uttar Pradesh, IndiaPreprint
Lybbert, T. J., Magnan, N., Spielman, D. J., Bhargava, A. K., & Gulati, K. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2309634 · Cited by 23
Inelastic and Fragmented Farm Supply Response for Second‐generation Bioenergy Feedstocks: Ex Ante Survey Evidence from Wisconsin
Mooney, D. F., Barham, B. L., & Lian, C. (2015) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppu033 · Cited by 22
Realized and potential global production effects from genetic engineering
Scheitrum, D. P., Schaefer, K. A., & Nes, K. (2020) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101882 · Cited by 22
Shadow prices of social capital in rural India, a nonparametric approach
Serra, T., & Poli, E. (2014) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.019 · Cited by 24
A behavioral economic analysis of bounded rationality in farm financing decisions
Mußhoff, O., & Hirschauer, N. (2011) · Agricultural Finance Review · doi:10.1108/00021461111128165 · Cited by 24
Which farmers benefit the most from Bt corn adoption? Estimating heterogeneity effects in the Philippines
Mutuc, M. E. M., Rejesus, R. M., & Yorobe, J. M. (2013) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12006 · Cited by 21
Economic Performance of Bt Cotton Varieties in PakistanPreprint
Nazli, H., Sarker, R., Meilke, K. D., & Orden, D. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.61181 · Cited by 21
Smart precision agriculture but resource constrained farmers: Is service provision a potential solution? Farmer's willingness to pay for laser-land leveling services in Nepal
Paudel, G. P., Khanal, A. R., Rahut, D. B., Krupnik, T. J., & McDonald, A. J. (2022) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2022.100084 · Cited by 20
Governing Health Systems in Africa
Sama, M. T., & Nguyen, V. (2009) · Cited by 20
Impact Assessment of Bt Corn Adoption in the Philippines
Mutuc, M. E. M., Rejesus, R. M., Pan, S., & Yorobe, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/s1074070800000201 · Cited by 20
Diffusion du coton génétiquement modifié en Chine : leçons sur les facteurs et les limites d’un succès
Fok, M. A. C., Liang, W., Wang, G., & Wu, Y. (2005) · Économie rurale · doi:10.4000/economierurale.3112 · Cited by 20
Post-harvest storage practices and techniques used by farmers in semi-arid Eastern and Central Kenya.
Bett, C., Nguyo, R., & Ahmed, K. Z. (2007) · 8th African Crop Science Society Conference, El-Minia, Egypt, 27-31 October 2007 · Cited by 19
Farmer Acceptance of Genetically Modified seeds in Germany: Results of a Cluster Analysis
Gyau, A., Voss, J., Spiller, A., & Enneking, U. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.92552 · Cited by 19
The Economic Impacts of Biotechnology-Based Technological InnovationsPreprint
Traxler, G., & Traxler, G. (2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.23806 · Cited by 19
Genetically modified crops in developing countries: Savior or traitor?
Azadi, H., Taheri, F., Ghazali, S., Moghaddam, S. M., Siamian, N., Goli, I., Choobchian, S., Pour, M. G., Özgüven, A. I., Janečková, K., et al. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133296 · Cited by 18
Farmers’ valuation of transgenic biofortified sorghum for nutritional improvement in Burkina Faso: A latent class approach
Obi, C., Sanou, E. I. R., Tur-Cardona, J., Bartolini, F., Gheysen, G., & Speelman, S. (2018) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.06.006 · Cited by 17
Heterogeneous incentives for innovation adoption: The price effect on segmented markets
Bonjean, I. (2019) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101741 · Cited by 18
Irrigators’ willingness to pay for the adoption of soil moisture monitoring tools in South-Eastern Africa
Abebe, F., Zuo, A., Wheeler, S. A., Bjørnlund, H., van Rooyen, A., Pittock, J., Mdemu, M., & Chilundo, M. (2020) · International Journal of Water Resources Development · doi:10.1080/07900627.2020.1755956 · Cited by 22
Asymmetric Willingness-to-Pay Distributions for Livestock Manure
Norwood, F. B., Luter, R. L., & Massey, R. E. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.30972 · Cited by 17
The economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries: a note on the methods
Smale, M., Zambrano, P., Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., Gruère, G., & Matuschke, I. (2008) · International Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbt.2008.022491 · Cited by 16
Farmers willingness to grow GM food and cash crops: empirical evidence from Pakistan
Ali, A., & Rahut, D. B. (2018) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2018.1544831 · Cited by 17
Do European Union farmers reject genetically modified maize? : farmer preferences for genetically modified maize in Greece
Skevas, T., Kikulwe, E., Papadopoulou, E., Skevas, I., & Wesseler, J. (2012) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 16
The Costs of Coexistence Measures for Genetically Modified Maize in Germany
Venus, T. J., Dillen, K., Punt, M., & Wesseler, J. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12178 · Cited by 15
Development, adoption and performance of Bt cotton in Pakistan: a review.
Ahsan, R., & Altaf, Z. (2009) · Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research · Cited by 15
The impact of Bt cotton adoption on the stability of pesticide use
Qiao, F., Huang, J., Shu-kun, W. A. N. G., & Qiang, L. (2017) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(17)61699-x · Cited by 14
Transgénicos en Argentina: más allá del boom de la soja
Vara, A. M. (2004) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 14
Diffusion of Bt Cotton in India: Impact of Seed Prices and Varietal Approval
Arora, A., & Bansal, S. (2011) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppr038 · Cited by 14
Damage from Secondary Pests and the Need for Refuge in China
Wang, S., Just, D. R., & Pinstrup‐Andersen, P. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_28 · Cited by 14
IMPACT OF OFF-FARM INCOME ON ADOPTION OF CONSERVATION PRACTICESPreprint
Gedikoğlu, H., & McCann, L. M. J. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.9944 · Cited by 14
Ex Ante Evaluation of Drought‐Tolerant Varieties in Eastern and Central Africa
Kostandini, G., Mills, B. F., & Mykerezi, E. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00281.x · Cited by 13
Are GMO Policies “Trade Related”? Empirical Analysis of Latin America
Smith, P. J., & Katovich, E. S. (2016) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppw021 · Cited by 14
Study on the Implications of Asynchronous GMO Approvals for EU Imports of Animal Feed Products
Nowicki, P., Aramyan, L. H., Baltussen, W. H. M., Dvortsin, L., Jongeneel, R. A., Domínguez, I. P., van Wagenberg, C. P. A., Kalaitzandonakes, N., Kaufman, J., Miller, D. R., et al. (2010) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 13
Transgenic Bt Cotton: Effects on Target and Non-Target Insect Diversity
Arshad, M., Khan, R. R., Aslam, A., & Akbar, W. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.73182 · Cited by 13
Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries: Options and opportunities in crops, forestry, livestock, fisheries and agro-industry to face the challenges of food insecurity and climate change (ABDC-10)
Ruane, J., Sonnino, A., Martínez, V. C. P., Murphy, D. J., Montfort, N. A., & Bennadji, Z. (2010) · Cited by 12
Impacts of Bt cotton on profitability, productivity and farm inputs in Pakistan: use of panel models
Bakhsh, K. (2017) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x17000080 · Cited by 12
Preferences, Norms and Constraints in farmers' agro-ecological choices. Case study using a choice experiments survey in the Rhone River Delta, France
Jaeck, M., & Lifran, R. (2009) · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.47948 · Cited by 12
Property Rights Protection of Biotechnology Innovations
Burton, D. M., Love, H. A., Özertan, G., & Taylor, C. R. (2005) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00083.x · Cited by 12
Is Monsanto Leaving Money on the Table? Monopoly Pricing and Bt Cotton Value with Heterogeneous Adopters
Oehmke, J. F., & Wolf, C. A. (2004) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/s1074070800026961 · Cited by 12
Bundling Technology and Insurance: Packages versus Technology Traits
Foltz, J. D., Useche, P., & Barham, B. L. (2012) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aas046 · Cited by 11
The GM Cold War: How Developing Countries Can Go from Being Dominos to Being Players
Meijer, E., & Stewart, R. B. (2004) · Review of European Community & International Environmental Law · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9388.2004.00406.x · Cited by 11
A Critical Assessment of Methods for Analysis of Social Welfare Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops: a Literature Survey
Scatasta, S., Wesseler, J., & Demont, M. (2006) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 11

Authors: Qaim, M., & de Janvry, A.
Affiliations: University of Bonn (DE)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID: Qaim, Matin
Venue: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2003-11
Volume: 85
Issue: 4
Pages: 814-828
ISSN: 0002-9092 (ISSN-L)
1467-8276
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8276.00490
OpenAlex: W2149923608
Cited by: 212
References: 18
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI: 19.72
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: American Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
GRO (submittedVersion)
Funders: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Rockefeller Foundation
Topics: Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords: Bt cotton, genetically modified crops, seed pricing, monopoly pricing, technology adoption, willingness to pay, insecticide application, crop yield, Pareto improvement, Argentina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Genetically Modified Crops, Corporate Pricing Strategies, and Farmers' Adoption: The Case of Bt Cotton in Argentina

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks