The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Elite, the Natives, and the Outsiders: Migration and Labor Market Segmentation in Urban China
Abstract
Established migration theories are mostly based on capitalist market economies and downplay the role of institutions in internal migration and labor market processes. In socialist and transitional economies such as those in Russia and China, however, investigations of migration and the labor market must begin by examining the nature and consequences of state institutions. In this article, I argue that the migration and labor market processes in Chinese cities are deeply influenced by an institution-based opportunity structure. The household registration (hukou) system, in particular, is interwoven with distribution of services and job opportunities. Most peasants who enter cities in response to increased demands for cheap labor are not granted urban citizenship and are treated as “outsiders” to the urban society. The experiences of these “temporary migrants” contrast with those of “permanent migrants” who are state-sponsored or have access to institutional resources. Using qualitative accounts from a 1995 village-level survey in Sichuan and Anhui and quantitative data from a survey I conducted in Guangzhou in 1998, this article examines the most salient differences among the three subpopulations with different resident statuses: nonmigrant urban natives, permanent migrants, and temporary migrants. I show that resident status is central to explaining migration processes and labor market segmentation in the Chinese city. The findings indicate that in terms of human capital attributes, mobility resources, and labor market entry and shifts, permanent migrants are the most privileged and successful elite, followed by nonmigrant natives, and finally by temporary migrants at the bottom of the hierarchy. These results hint at a new social order of stratification in Chinese cities, underscore the compelling relations between internal migration and labor market development in transitional economies, and suggest that in these economies the state deepens the bifurcation effects about which labor market segmentation theory is concerned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The process and driving forces of rural hollowing in China under rapid urbanization
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., & Long, H. (2010) · Journal of Geographical Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11442-010-0817-2 · Cited by 451
Fan, C. C., & Scott, A. J. (2003) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00213.x · Cited by 377
Self-citationRural‐urban migration and gender division of labor in transitional China
Fan, C. C. (2003) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00429 · Cited by 306
Self-citationThe development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen
Hao, P., Sliuzas, R., & Geertman, S. (2011) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.001 · Cited by 270
The state, the migrant labor regime, and maiden workers in China
Fan, C. C. (2004) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.013 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, C. C.
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-124
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W2046206407
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Elite, the Natives, and the Outsiders: Migration and Labor Market Segmentation in Urban China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8306.00282
- The paper
- Fan, C. C. (2002). The Elite, the Natives, and the Outsiders: Migration and Labor Market Segmentation in Urban China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.