The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research
Abstract
Despite considerable progress in recent geographic information systems (GIS) research (especially on public-participation GIS), the critical discourse on GIS in the 1990s does not seem to have affected GIS practices in geographic research in significant ways. Development in critical GIS practice has been quite limited to date, and GIS and critical geographies remain two separate, if not overtly antagonistic, worlds. This suggests that critical engagement that seeks to conceive and materialize the critical potential of GIS for geographic research is still sorely needed. In this article, I explore the possibilities for this kind of critical engagement through revisiting some of the central arguments in the critical discourse from feminist perspectives. I examine whether GIS methods are inherently incompatible with feminist epistemologies through interrogating their connection with positivist scientific practices and visualization technologies. Bearing in mind the limitations of current GIS, I explore several ways in which GIS methods may be used to enrich feminist geographic research. I propose to reimagine GIS as a method in feminist geography and describe feminist visualization as a possible critical practice in feminist research. I argue that GIS can be re-envisioned and used in feminist geography in ways that are congenial to feminist epistemologies and politics. These alternative practices represent a new kind of critical engagement with GIS that is grounded on the critical agency of the GIS user/researcher.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics
Rose, G. (1997) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913297673302122 · Cited by 2,390
Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-3763 · Cited by 2,161
Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research∗
England, K. V. L. (1994) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x · Cited by 2,075
Cited by
Enhancing and expanding intersectional research for climate change adaptation in agrarian settings
Thompson-Hall, M., Carr, E. R., & Pascual, U. (2016) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0827-0 · Cited by 145
Wyly, E. (2009) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1080/00330120902931952 · Cited by 134
Mapping the Political Landscape: Toward a GIS Analysis of Environmental and Social Difference
Kosiba, S., & Bauer, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9126-z · Cited by 80
The Spatial Politics of Affect and Emotion in Participatory GIS
Young, J. C., & Gilmore, M. P. (2013) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.707596 · Cited by 72
Digitize and punish: Computerized crime mapping and racialized carceral power in Chicago
Jefferson, B. J. (2017) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775817697703 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwan, M.-P.
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 645-661
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W2127990839
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 100.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8306.00309
- The paper
- Kwan, M.-P. (2002). Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.