The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practicing New Economic Geographies: A Methodological Examination
Abstract
Practicing new economic geographies necessarily entails a critical re-evaluation of research methodologies because of its different substantive research foci. In this article, I examine some methodological implications of the recent refiguring of the “economic” in economic geography. Some key features of new economic geographies include understanding the social embeddedness of economic action, mapping shifting identities of social actors, and exploring the role of material and discursive contexts in shaping economic behavior. I argue that practitioners of new economic geographies can no longer rely exclusively on established “scientific” methodology for empirical research and data analysis. Instead, I argue for a process-based methodological framework through which we employ complementary methodological practices (e.g., tracing actor networks and in situ research) and triangulation, not only to explore the microfoundations of economic action, but also to generate, in a reflexive manner, theoretical insights from the multiscalar dimensions of economic action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
The Rise of the Network Society
Castells, M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444319514 · Cited by 4,664
Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics
Rose, G. (1997) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913297673302122 · Cited by 2,390
Global production networks and the analysis of economic development
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290210150842 · Cited by 2,216
Self-citationGetting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research∗
England, K. V. L. (1994) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x · Cited by 2,075
Nast, H. J. (1994) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x · Cited by 488
Herod, A. (1999) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00024-x · Cited by 248
Cited by
The devolution of urban food waste governance: Case study of food rescue in Los Angeles
Warshawsky, D. N. (2015) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.006 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Wai-chung Yeung, H.
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 442-462
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W2031036777
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 98.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practicing New Economic Geographies: A Methodological Examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8306.9302011
- The paper
- Wai-chung Yeung, H. (2003). Practicing New Economic Geographies: A Methodological Examination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.