The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State–Theoretical Perspective
Abstract
This paper discusses the recurrence and the recurrent limitations of liberalism as a general discourse, strategy, and regime. It then establishes a continuum of neoliberalism ranging from a project for radical system transformation from state socialism to market capitalism, through a basic regime shift within capitalism, to more limited policy adjustments intended to maintain another type of accumulation regime and its mode of regulation. These last two forms of neoliberalism are then related to a broader typology of approaches to the restructuring, rescaling, and reordering of accumulation and regulation in advanced capitalist societies: neoliberalism, neocorporatism, neostatism, and neocommunitarianism. These arguments are illustrated in the final part of the paper through a critique of the World Report on the Urban Future 21 (World Commission 2000), both as an explicit attempt to promote flanking and supporting measures to sustain the neoliberal project on the urban scale and as an implicit attempt to naturalize that project on a global scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shatkin, G. (2011) · Worlding Cities · doi:10.1002/9781444346800.ch3 · Cited by 116
Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America
Perreault, T., & Martin, P. (2005) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37394 · Cited by 106
The devolution of urban food waste governance: Case study of food rescue in Los Angeles
Warshawsky, D. N. (2015) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.006 · Cited by 48
Place branding and economic development at the local level in Ontario, Canada
Cleave, E., & Arku, G. (2015) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9555-9 · Cited by 41
South, N. (2016) · Hazardous Waste and Pollution · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18081-6_2 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Jessop, B.
- Venue
- Antipode
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 452-472
- ISSN
- 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8330
- OpenAlex
- W2095842624
- Cited by
- 1,459
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 101.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.