The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hong Kong and the globalisation of the Chinese diaspora: a geographical perspective
Abstract
This study examines the processes of spatial restructuring in the Hong Kong–South China region. The paper analyses urban‐rural interaction in a historical and transnational context. Based on detailed census data collected in 1961 and 1996, this study traces the origins of the Hongkongers and maps out their spatial distribution according to their native place identities. The heightened population movement between the rural hinterland in the South China region and the Hong Kong metropolis is inseparable from territorial organisation on the Chinese mainland. The great spatial mobility demonstrated by the Hongkongers, or, their ‘refugee mentality’ as it is known, is found to be deeply rooted in their marginal sub‐ethnic identity in the nation. A systematic analysis of spatial data reveals that the diasporic landscape developed in Hong Kong has been polarised by the élite English and Shanghainese speakers on the one end and the Kejia people on the other end. Despite the processes of globalisation, the great spatial mobility of the Hong Kong sojourners and the diasporic landscape they have created have been effectively shaped by their place‐based ethno‐linguistic identities. If the transnational movement of people is considered an important component of globalisation, then this study reinforces the importance of locality and contests the fashionable notion of globalisation as a ‘placeless’ phenomenon. The seemingly displaced empire of Chinese diaspora capitalism, in which Hong Kong…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Inquiry into Cultural Continuity and Change in Housing: An Iranian Perspective
Sani, R. M., & Mahasti, P. (2013) · Sociology Mind · doi:10.4236/sm.2013.33031 · Cited by 7
“In fact, as Lin (2002) states, the shift of the intellectual emphasis from modernity (homogenizing processes of cultural imperialism and Westernization) to post-modernism (fragmented global cultural transformation processes) has been important in developing countries.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, G. C. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, George C.S.
- ORCID
- Lin, George C.S.
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Viewpoint
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-91
- ISSN
- 0030-8978 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-7456
- 1467-8373
- OpenAlex
- W2163422494
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia Pacific Viewpoint (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Hong Kong
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › China's Global Influence and Migration
- Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
- Keywords
- Chinese diaspora, Hong Kong, globalization, spatial restructuring, urban-rural relations, transnational migration, ethnolinguistic identity, spatial mobility, Shanghainese, English speakers, place identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review