The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Institutional Approach to Innovation Policy
Abstract
Modern research and innovation policy is largely based on neoclassical welfare economics, in which the diagnosis of market failure in the production of new information is translated into a case for innovation policy. Both New Institutional and Public Choice economics criticise this approach because it tends to assume that policy interventions are largely costless and produce only benefits. An alternative policy model is proposed that focuses on minimising the social costs of innovation policy through efficient choice of institutions. We review the recently released National Innovation and Science Agenda through this lens.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is important to note that government is one of the main actors in promoting innovation and the adoption of technological advances (Davidson and Potts, 2016) and the diversification in the A-C strategy responds to the new institutional rules adopted at European, national, and regional levels.”
From Governance of the circular economy in the canned fish industry: A case study from Spain (2024) · cites this paper as Davidson and Potts, 2016
In the citing paper
“Therefore, it is important to note that the government is one of the main agents in promoting innovation and the adoption of technological advances (Davidson and Potts, 2016).”
From Governance of the circular economy in the canned fish industry: A case study from Spain (2024) · cites this paper as Davidson and Potts, 2016
Citations
Cites
Economic development as self-discovery
Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(03)00124-x · Cited by 1,840
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Allen, 1983, Collective invention, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1, 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9 · DOI
- Arrow, 1962, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity
- Bakhshi, 2011, State of Uncertainty: Innovation Policy through Experimentation
- Baumol, 1990, Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 891, 10.1086/261712 · DOI · Paper page
- Bergstrom, 1986, On the private provision of public goods, Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25, 10.1016/0047-2727(86)90024-1 · DOI
- Boldrin, 2004, Rent-seeking and innovation, Journal of Monetary Economics, 51, 127, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.07.006 · DOI
- Boldrin, 2007, Against Intellectual Monopoly
- Buchanan, 1962, The Calculus of Consent, 10.3998/mpub.7687 · DOI
- 2015, National Innovation and Science Agenda
- Davidson, 2010, Positive externalities and R&D: Two conflicting traditions in economic theory, Review of Political Economy, 22, 355, 10.1080/09538259.2010.491284 · DOI
- Diamond, 2006, The relative success of private funders and government funders in funding important science, European Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 149, 10.1007/s10657-006-6647-0 · DOI
- Djankov, 2003, The new comparative economics, Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, 595, 10.1016/j.jce.2003.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Dodgson, 2011, Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia, Research Policy, 40, 1,145, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015 · DOI
- Dourado, 2015, Public choice perspectives on intellectual property, Public Choice, 163, 129, 10.1007/s11127-014-0195-x · DOI
- Fauchart, 2008, Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs, Organization Science, 19, 187, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0314 · DOI
- Foray, 2009, Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for Science, Technology and Innovation
- Foss, 2012, Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment, 10.1017/CBO9781139021173 · DOI
- Freeman, 1995, The national system of innovation in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5
- Goolsbee, 1998, Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers, American Economic Review, 88, 298
- Greenberg, 2001, Science, Money and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion
- Kealey, 1996, The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, 10.1007/978-1-349-24667-0 · DOI
- Kealey, 2014, Modelling science as a contribution good, Research Policy, 43, 1,014, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.009 · DOI
- Lerner, 2002, The simple economics of open source, Journal of Industrial Economics, 52, 197, 10.1111/1467-6451.00174 · DOI · Paper page
- Lindsay, 2013, Efficiency in the provision of pure public goods by private citizens, Public Choice, 156, 31, 10.1007/s11127-012-9942-z · DOI
- McCloskey, 2010, Bourgeois Dignity, 10.7208/chicago/9780226556666.001.0001 · DOI
- McCloskey, 2016, Bourgeois Equality, 10.7208/chicago/9780226334042.001.0001 · DOI
- Martin, 2000, The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation, Research Policy, 29, 437, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00084-0 · DOI
- Mokyr, 2001, The Gifts of Athena
- Moser, 2005, How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world's fair, American Economic Review, 95, 1,214, 10.1257/0002828054825501 · DOI
- Moser, 2012, Innovation without patents: Evidence from world's fairs, Journal of Law and Economics, 55, 43, 10.1086/663631 · DOI
- Nelson, 1959, The simple economics of basic scientific research, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 296, 10.1086/258177 · DOI
- Nelson, 1982, An Economic Theory of Economic Change
- Olson, 1982, The Rise and Decline of Nations
- 2003, The Sources of Economic Growth in OECD Countries
- 2013, Innovation-Driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialization
- Raustiala, 2006, The piracy paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design, Virginia Law Review, 92, 1,687
- Romer, 1990, Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71, 10.1086/261725 · DOI · Paper page
- Schumpeter, 1934, The Theory of Economic Development
- Trajtenberg, 2012, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited
- von Hippel, 1998, Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information, Management Science, 44, 629, 10.1287/mnsc.44.5.629 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Governance of the circular economy in the canned fish industry: A case study from Spain
Fernández-González, R., Teixeira Pereira, Z. G., & Ricoy-Casas, R. M. (2024) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2024.103618 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidson, S., & Potts, J.
- Venue
- Australian Economic Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 200-207
- ISSN
- 0004-9018
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
