Cited by 18Climate Change Policy and EconomicsAgricultural economics and policiesForest Management and Policy

Agriculture’s carbon neutral challenge: the case of Western Australia.

Open access
Kingwell, Ross·2021·Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Abstract

Agriculture is being encouraged to become carbon neutral, and agricultural land is being touted as a source of carbon sequestration. Yet making agricultural regions locally carbon neutral will involve an economic cost, with existing patterns of greenhouse gas emissions and spatial costs of abatement affecting that cost of achieving regional carbon neutrality. This study examines the economic cost of locally achieving carbon neutrality, using the illustration of Western Australia’s agricultural region. The cost to the region of achieving carbon neutrality via reforestation is estimated, as is the spatial allocation of farmland for sequestration. Social and political pressures that likely constrain how much farmland can be reforested are explicitly considered. Findings are subject to a sensitivity analysis and several caveats. The annual cost of regional carbon neutrality via proscribed regional reforestation, under current carbon offset prices, is estimated to range from AUD216 million to AUD250 million (i.e. under 3 per cent of the region’s gross value of agricultural production) which might suggest the challenge to be carbon neutral is within commercial reach. However, without other financial incentives, it likely involves farm business profits being reduced by around 15 per cent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8489.12440

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emissions could continue to be offset by increasing the area planted to trees, but this may impact on livestock production.

    “Emissions could continue to be offset by increasing the area planted to trees, but this may impact on livestock production (Kingwell 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bardsley, P. (1994) The collapse of the Australian wool reserve price scheme. The Economic Journal , 104, 1087 -1105.
  2. Cacho, O. & Lipper, L. (2007). Abatement and transaction costs of carbon sink projects involving smallholders. FEEM Working Paper No. 27.2007, Available from URL: https:// ssrn.com/abstract=976400
  3. CIE (2015) The business case for carbon farming. Improving your farm sustainability. Workshop manual, Kondinin Information Services, 216 pp.
  4. DISER (2020a) Quarterly update of Australia's National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: December 2019. Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, Commonwealth of Australia 2020.
  5. Eady, S.J., Sanguansri, P., Bektash, R., Ridoutt, B., Simons, L. & Swiergon, P. (2011) Carbon foot-print for Australian agricultural products and downstream food products in the supermarket. Paper presented at the Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society 7th Conference, Melbourne, 9-10 March 2011.
  6. Eckard, R., Grainger, C. & De Klein, C. (2010) Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: a review. Livestock Science , 130, 47 -56.
  7. Ferguson, I. (2014) Australian plantations: mixed signals ahead. International Forestry Review , 16, 160 -171.
  8. Ford, M., Gurney, A., Tulloh, C., McInnis, T., Mi, R. & Ahammad, H. (2009) Agriculture and the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS): economic issues and implications. Outlook 2009: Issues and Insights 09.2, pp. 30.
  9. George, S.J., Harper, R.J., Hobbs, R.J. & Tibbett, M. (2012) A sustainable agricultural landscape for Australia: A review of interlacing carbon sequestration, biodiversity and salinity management in agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment , 163, 28 -36.
  10. Harper, R.J., Sochacki, S.J. & McGrath, J.F. (2017) The development of reforestation options for dryland farmland in south-western Australia: a review. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science , 79, 185 -196.
  11. Harris-Adams, K. & Kingwell, R. (2009) An analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture in Western Australia and the opportunities for agroforestry offsets. A contributed paper to the Australian Agricultural & Resource Economics Society's annual conference, Cairns, Feb 11-13, 2009.
  12. Kingwell, R. & Pannell, D. (2005) Economic trends and drivers affecting the wheatbelt of Western Australia to 2030. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research , 56, 1 -9.
  13. Paul, K. & Polglase, P. (2004) Calibration of the RothC model to turnover of soil carbon under eucalypts and pines. Australian Journal of Soil Research , 42, 883 -895.
  14. Planfarm (2019) Planfarm Benchmarks 2028-19. pp. 106. Available from URL: https://www. planfarm.com.au/products/planfarm-benchmarks.html
  15. Richards, K. & Stokes, C. (2004) A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Climatic Change , 63, 1 -48.
  16. Roque, B., Salwen, J., Kinley, R. & Kebreab, E. (2019) Inclusion of Asparagopsis armata in lactating dairy cows' diet reduces enteric methane emission by over 50 percent. Journal of Cleaner Production , 234, 132 -138.
  17. Sanderman, J., Farquharson, R. & Baldock, J. (2010) Soil Carbon Sequestration Potential: review for Australian agriculture. A report prepared for the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Canberra. Available from URL: https://www.mla.com.au/globalasse ts/mla-corporate/blocks/research-and-development/csiro-soil-c-review.pdf [accessed 16 Sep 2020]
  18. Shaikh, S., Sun, L. & van Kooten, G.C. (2007) Are agricultural values a reliable guide in determining landowners' decisions to create forest carbon sinks? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics , 55, 97 -114.
  19. Sudmeyer, R., Parker, J., Nath, T. & Ghose, A. (2014) Carbon farming in relation to Western Australian agriculture, Bulletin 4856. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia.
  20. Tang, K., Wang, M. & Zhou, D. (2021) Abatement potential and cost of agricultural greenhouse gases in Australian dryland farming system. Environmental Science and Pollution Research , 28(17), 21862 -21873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11867-w · DOI
  21. Thamo, T., Addai, D., Kragt, M., Kingwell, R., Pannell, D. & Robertson, M.J. (2019) Climate change reduces the mitigation obtainable from sequestration in an Australian farming system. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , 63, 841 -865.
  22. Thamo, T., Kingwell, R. & Pannell, D.J. (2013) Measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: economic implications for policy and agricultural producers. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , 57, 1 -19.
  23. Vyas, D., McGinn, S., Duval, S., Kindermann, M. & Beauchemin, K. (2016) Effects of sustained reduction of enteric methane emissions with dietary supplementation of 3nitrooxypropanol on growth performance of growing and finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science , 94, 2024 -2034.
  24. Yin, X., Goudriaan, J., Lantinga, E.A., Vos, J. & Spiertz, H.J. (2003) A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth. Annals of Botany , 91, 361 -371.
  25. Young, J., Kingwell, R., Bathgate, A. & Thompson, A. (2016) A review of agricultural greenhouse gas emission reporting: the implications for farm management. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems , 40, 261 -276.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kingwell, R.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Kingwell, Ross
Venue
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
566-595
ISSN
  • 1364-985X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8489
OpenAlex
W3176366445
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
carbon sequestration, reforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, abatement costs, farm profitability, Western Australia agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review