Cited by 145Inclusive Education and DiversityCollaborative Teaching and InclusionEducation Pedagogy and Practices

Education, Inclusion and Individual Differences: Recognising and Resolving Dilemmas

Norwich, Brahm·2002·British Journal of Educational Studies

Abstract

The case is presented for a dilemmatic perspective to the educational provision for pupils and students with difficulties and disabilities. This perspective recognises the links and tensions between social and individual values and models. The paper focuses on the central significance of dilemmas of difference in understanding policy and practice issues in the field. One of the central arguments is that a commitment to inclusion implies a commitment to meeting the needs of a minority and therefore to arrangements which may not be required by the majority. Inclusion is about mainstream schools accommodating a full diversity, and in doing so leads inevitably to adopting dedicated or specialised support systems for some. The paper provides an overview of recent changes in policy and practice as well as looking at possible future trends. An inter–disciplinary model which connects individual and social perspectives is proposed both for explanatory purposes and for designing provision in terms of the interaction between the inclusivity of the system and responding to additional individual needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00215

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These conceptualizations and materializations either subsume disability issues into an amorphous, melting pot of vaguely defined and perceived 'diversity' or solely focus on persons with disabilities and, to a lesser extent, persons with other minoritized identities without considering issues of intersectionality and social injustice and their impact on accessibility in educational and social dom

    “These conceptualizations and materializations either subsume disability issues into an amorphous, melting pot of vaguely defined and perceived 'diversity' (Norwich 2002) or solely focus on persons with disabilities and, to a lesser extent, persons with other minoritized identities without considering issues of intersectionality and social injustice and their impact on accessibility in educational”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norwich, B.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Norwich, Brahm
Venue
British Journal of Educational Studies
Published
2002-12
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
482-502
ISSN
  • 0007-1005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8527
OpenAlex
W2009873923
Cited by
145
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
inclusive education, individual differences, special educational needs, disability, mainstreaming, education policy, educational services, interdisciplinary model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review