Education, Inclusion and Individual Differences: Recognising and Resolving Dilemmas
Abstract
The case is presented for a dilemmatic perspective to the educational provision for pupils and students with difficulties and disabilities. This perspective recognises the links and tensions between social and individual values and models. The paper focuses on the central significance of dilemmas of difference in understanding policy and practice issues in the field. One of the central arguments is that a commitment to inclusion implies a commitment to meeting the needs of a minority and therefore to arrangements which may not be required by the majority. Inclusion is about mainstream schools accommodating a full diversity, and in doing so leads inevitably to adopting dedicated or specialised support systems for some. The paper provides an overview of recent changes in policy and practice as well as looking at possible future trends. An inter–disciplinary model which connects individual and social perspectives is proposed both for explanatory purposes and for designing provision in terms of the interaction between the inclusivity of the system and responding to additional individual needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These conceptualizations and materializations either subsume disability issues into an amorphous, melting pot of vaguely defined and perceived 'diversity' or solely focus on persons with disabilities and, to a lesser extent, persons with other minoritized identities without considering issues of intersectionality and social injustice and their impact on accessibility in educational and social dom
“These conceptualizations and materializations either subsume disability issues into an amorphous, melting pot of vaguely defined and perceived 'diversity' (Norwich 2002) or solely focus on persons with disabilities and, to a lesser extent, persons with other minoritized identities without considering issues of intersectionality and social injustice and their impact on accessibility in educational”
From Accessibility and universal design in higher education curricula: implications for inclusion/exclusion (2025) · cites this paper as Norwich 2002
Cites
The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine
Engel, G. L. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.847460 · Cited by 12,887 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A social relational model of disability: a theoretical framework for special needs education?
Reindal, S. M. (2008) · European Journal of Special Needs Education · doi:10.1080/08856250801947812 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Mavrou, K., Theodorou, E., Mouka, M., & Liasidou, A. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2507244 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…conceptualizations and materializations either subsume disability issues into an amorphous, melting pot of vaguely defined and perceived ‘diversity’ (Norwich 2002) or solely focus on persons with disabilities and, to a lesser extent, persons with other minor-itized identities without considering…”
Influential
- Authors
- Norwich, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Norwich, Brahm
- ORCID
- Norwich, Brahm
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 482-502
- ISSN
- 0007-1005 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8527
- OpenAlex
- W2009873923
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- inclusive education, individual differences, special educational needs, disability, mainstreaming, education policy, educational services, interdisciplinary model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review