The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions
Abstract
Time constraints and teaching in crowded classrooms restrict in-depth dialogical interaction in teaching and learning. Electronic conferencing systems, however, have the potential to foster online discussions beyond class time. Case-based instruction also constitutes a promising approach in fostering learners’ participation and reflection. The purpose of this study was to investigate (a) the extent to which an electronic conferencing system, named COW (“Conferencing on the Web”), facilitates pre-service teachers’ communication outside their classroom, when discussing teaching cases from their field experiences, and (b) the potential of COW and case-based instruction to foster quality discourse and promote students’ critical-thinking skills. The results showed that students’ online discourse was mostly an exchange of personal experiences and did not reflect well-supported reasoning. Future research on the issue of interactivity should address motivational and affective variables related to the implementation of distance-education methods, variations in pedagogical activity and task structure, and the readiness of mentors and learners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Media will never influence learning
Clark, R. E. (1994) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299088 · Cited by 1,893
Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”
Bruffee, K. A. (1984) · College English · doi:10.2307/376924 · Cited by 1,016
Cited by
Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2 · Cited by 1,474
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019 · Cited by 568
Student Engagement in Online Learning: What Works and Why
Meyer, K. A. (2014) · ASHE Higher Education Report · doi:10.1002/aehe.20018 · Cited by 259
Holmes, B. (2013) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12015 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-43
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2118281295
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 58.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8535.00302
- The paper
- Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.