The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employees and High‐Performance Work Systems: Testing inside the Black Box
Abstract
Most work on high‐performance work systems has examined only the direct relationship between a set of management practices and performance outcomes. This presumes that any connection operates through the incentive and motivational effects captured as ‘high‐commitment’ or ‘high‐involvement’ employee outcomes. No attempt has been made to examine the alternative, Labour Process conceptualization, which expects performance gains from new management practices to arise instead from work intensification, offloading of taskcontrols, and increased job strain. Using data from WERS98, we tested models based on high‐performance work systems and labour process approaches. Both were found wanting, and we consider the possible implications of these failures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Cited by
Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.538978 · Cited by 463
The (potential) demise of HRM?
Dundon, T., & Rafferty, A. (2018) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12195 · Cited by 144
Strategic or Silencing? Line Managers’ Repurposing of Employee Voice Mechanisms for High Performance
Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. M. (2022) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12469 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D., & Harley, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Industrial Relations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 501-531
- ISSN
- 0007-1080 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8543
- OpenAlex
- W2155563387
- Cited by
- 891
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
