The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of Mind, Emotion Understanding, Language, and Family Background: Individual Differences and Interrelations
Abstract
Individual differences in young children's social cognition were examined in 128 urban preschoolers from a wide range of backgrounds. Comprehensive assessments were made of children's false-belief understanding, emotion understanding, language abilities, and family background information was collected via parent interview. Individual differences in children's understanding of false-belief and emotion were associated with differences in language ability and with certain aspects of family background, in particular, parental occupational class and mothers' education. The number of siblings that children had did not relate to their social cognition. Individual differences in false-belief and emotion understanding were correlated, but these domains did not contribute to each other independently of age, language ability, and family background. In fact, variance in family background only contributed uniquely to false-belief understanding. The results suggest that family background has a significant impact on the development of theory of mind. The findings also suggest that understanding of false-belief and understanding of emotion may be distinct aspects of social cognition in young children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Age and Verbal Ability in the Theory of Mind Task Performance of Subjects with Autism
Happe, F. G. E. (1995) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131954 · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks.
Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x · Cited by 1,980
Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Das Gupta, M., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2002) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00501 · Cited by 757
Understanding Other Minds: Linking Developmental Psychology and Functional Neuroimaging
Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142044 · Cited by 726
Language and theory of mind: a study of deaf children
Schick, B., De Villiers, P., De Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01004.x · Cited by 585
The parent–infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., & Target, M. (2007) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01727.x · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 853-865
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2007937264
- Cited by
- 808
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of Mind, Emotion Understanding, Language, and Family Background: Individual Differences and Interrelations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8624.00061
- The paper
- Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of Mind, Emotion Understanding, Language, and Family Background: Individual Differences and Interrelations. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.