Cited by 587Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

A Secure Base from Which to Explore Close Relationships

Waters, Everett, Cummings, E Mark·2000·Child Development

Abstract

The theory of attachment as a secure-base relationship integrates insights about affect, cognition, and behavior in close relationships across age and culture. Empirical successes based on this theory include important discoveries about the nature of infant–caregiver and adult–adult close relationships, the importance of early experience, and about stability and change in individual differences. The task now is to preserve these insights and successes and build on them. To accomplish this, we need to continually examine the logic and coherence of attachment theory and redress errors of emphasis and analysis. Views on attachment development, attachment representation, and attachment in family and cross-cultural perspective need to be updated in light of empirical research and advances in developmental theory, behavioral biology, and cognitive psychology. We also need to challenge the theory by formulating and testing hypotheses which, if not confirmed, would require significant changes to the theory. If we can accomplish these tasks, prospects for important developments in attachment theory and research are greater than ever, as are the prospects for integration with other disciplines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00130

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 587

Authors
Waters, E., & Cummings, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
164-172
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2051648402
Cited by
587
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
FWCI
20.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh044935-10)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH44935)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD36261, R01HD036261)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
attachment theory, secure base, close relationships, early life experience, individual differences, attachment development, attachment representations, family attachment, behavioral biology, cognitive psychology
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Object Attachment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review