Middle-class African American adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority and parenting practices: A longitudinal investigation
Abstract
Conceptions of parental authority and ratings of parental rules and decision making were examined longitudinally among 82 middle-class African American adolescents and their parents (82 mothers and 52 fathers), who were divided into two groups according to family income. Adolescents were, on average, 13.14 years of age at Time 1 and 15.05 years of age at Time 2. Nearly all adolescents and parents affirmed parents' legitimate authority to regulate (and children's obligation to comply with) rules regarding moral, conventional, prudential, friendship, and multifaceted issues, but they were more equivocal in their judgments regarding personal issues. With age, adolescents increasingly judged personal issues to be beyond the bounds of legitimate parental authority, but judgments differed by family income. Adolescents from upper income families rejected parents' legitimate authority to regulate personal issues more at Time 1 than did adolescents from middle income families, but no differences were found at Time 2. Authority to regulate adolescents' behavior did not extend to other adults or to schools, churches, and the law. With adolescents' increasing age, African American families became less restrictive in regulating prudential, friendship, multifaceted, and personal issues. Adolescents', mothers', and fathers' judgments demonstrated significant continuity over time, but few cross- or within-generation associations in judgments were found. Conceptions of legitimate parental aut…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adolescents' changing beliefs about parents' legitimate authority to impose rules and restrictions may explain the peak in reactance proneness in adolescence.
“which may be due to adolescents' changing beliefs about parents' legitimate authority to impose rules and restrictions (Smetana, 1995).”
From Rebels With a Cause? Adolescent Defiance From the Perspective of Reactance Theory and Self-Determination Theory (2015) · cites this paper as Smetana, 1995
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Smetana, J. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smetana, Judith G
- ORCID
- Smetana, Judith G
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1672-1686
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2163324411
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- William T. Grant Foundation
- University of Rochester
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
- Keywords
- parental authority, parenting practices, African American adolescents, middle-class families, household income, adolescent development, family rules, moral regulation, prudential regulation, personal issues, intergenerational continuity, parents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Authoritarianism, Black or African American, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Individuation, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development, Social Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review