Cited by 228Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Middle-class African American adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority and parenting practices: A longitudinal investigation

Smetana, Judith G·2000·Child Development

Abstract

Conceptions of parental authority and ratings of parental rules and decision making were examined longitudinally among 82 middle-class African American adolescents and their parents (82 mothers and 52 fathers), who were divided into two groups according to family income. Adolescents were, on average, 13.14 years of age at Time 1 and 15.05 years of age at Time 2. Nearly all adolescents and parents affirmed parents' legitimate authority to regulate (and children's obligation to comply with) rules regarding moral, conventional, prudential, friendship, and multifaceted issues, but they were more equivocal in their judgments regarding personal issues. With age, adolescents increasingly judged personal issues to be beyond the bounds of legitimate parental authority, but judgments differed by family income. Adolescents from upper income families rejected parents' legitimate authority to regulate personal issues more at Time 1 than did adolescents from middle income families, but no differences were found at Time 2. Authority to regulate adolescents' behavior did not extend to other adults or to schools, churches, and the law. With adolescents' increasing age, African American families became less restrictive in regulating prudential, friendship, multifaceted, and personal issues. Adolescents', mothers', and fathers' judgments demonstrated significant continuity over time, but few cross- or within-generation associations in judgments were found. Conceptions of legitimate parental aut…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00257

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 228

Authors
Smetana, J. G.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Smetana, Judith G
Venue
Child Development
Published
2000-11-01
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
1672-1686
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2163324411
Cited by
228
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • William T. Grant Foundation
  • University of Rochester
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
parental authority, parenting practices, African American adolescents, middle-class families, household income, adolescent development, family rules, moral regulation, prudential regulation, personal issues, intergenerational continuity, parents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Authoritarianism, Black or African American, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Individuation, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development, Social Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review