The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Half a Word Is Enough: Infants Can Recognize Spoken Words Using Partial Phonetic Information
Open accessAbstract
Adults process speech incrementally, rapidly identifying spoken words on the basis of initial phonetic information sufficient to distinguish them from alternatives. In this study, infants in the second year also made use of word-initial information to understand fluent speech. The time course of comprehension was examined by tracking infants' eye movements as they looked at pictures in response to familiar spoken words, presented both as whole words in intact form and as partial words in which only the first 300 ms of the word was heard. In Experiment 1, 21-month-old infants (N=32) recognized partial words as quickly and reliably as they recognized whole words; in Experiment 2, these findings were replicated with 18-month-old infants (N=32). Combining the data from both experiments, efficiency in spoken word recognition was examined in relation to level of lexical development. Infants with more than 100 words in their productive vocabulary were more accurate in identifying familiar words than were infants with less than 60 words. Grouped by response speed, infants with faster mean reaction times were more accurate in word recognition and also had larger productive vocabularies than infants with slower response latencies. These results show that infants in the second year are capable of incremental speech processing even before entering the vocabulary spurt, and that lexical growth is associated with increased speed and efficiency in understanding spoken language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Cited by
SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12019 · Cited by 1,277
Self-citationN400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: processing known words in picture contexts.
Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929042304705 · Cited by 215
Molfese, V. J., Rudasill, K. M., Beswick, J. L., Jacobi-Vessels, J. L., Ferguson, M. C., & White, J. M. (2010) · Merrill-Palmer Quarterly · doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0039 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernald, A., Swingley, D., & Pinto, J. P.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1003-1015
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2104074670
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Half a Word Is Enough: Infants Can Recognize Spoken Words Using Partial Phonetic Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8624.00331
- The paper
- Fernald, A., Swingley, D., & Pinto, J. P. (2001). When Half a Word Is Enough: Infants Can Recognize Spoken Words Using Partial Phonetic Information. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.