Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,501

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces

Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C., Scopigno, R.·1998·Computer Graphics Forum

Abstract

This paper presents a new tool, Metro, designed to compensate for a deficiency in many simplification methods proposed in literature. Metro allows one to compare the difference between a pair of surfaces (e.g. a triangulated mesh and its simplified representation) by adopting a surface sampling approach. It has been designed as a highly general tool, and it does no assumption on the particular approach used to build the simplified representation. It returns both numerical results (meshes areas and volumes, maximum and mean error, etc.) and visual results, by coloring the input surface according to the approximation error.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8659.00236

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,501

Metadata

Authors
Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C., & Scopigno, R.
Venue
Computer Graphics Forum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
167-174
ISSN
  • 0167-7055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8659
OpenAlex
W2006502673
Cited by
1,501
References
0
FWCI
25.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8659.00236
The paper
Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C., & Scopigno, R. (1998). Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.00236

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.