The Boundary Problem and the Ideal of Democracy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relevant condition is a 'common world' in which the fulfilment of all or nearly all of the fundamental interests of each person is connected with the fulfilment of all or nearly all of the fundamental interests of every other person.
“Christiano expresses this condition in terms of creating a 'common world…in which the fulfilment of all or nearly all of the fundamental interests of each person are connected with the fulfilment of all or nearly all of the fundamental interests of every other person' (Christiano, 2006, p. 85; see also Erman, 2014, p. 541.)”
From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as Erman, 2014
Members of the demos should have an equal opportunity to influence the decisions reached.
“Beyond this, they should have an equal opportunity to influence the decisions reached (see Erman, 2014, pp. 539-42;Song, 2012, pp. 45-46; for a longer discussion of the role that the idea of equal influence plays in justifying democracy, see; Kolodny, 2014).”
From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as Erman, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem
Miller, D. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12707 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Beyond this, they should have an equal opportunity to influence the decisions reached (see Erman, 2014, pp. 539–42; Song, 2012, pp. 45–46; for a longer discussion of the role that the idea of equal influence plays in justifying democracy, see; Kolodny, 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Erman, E.
- Corresponding author
- Erman, Eva
- ORCID
- Erman, Eva
- Venue
- Constellations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 535-546
- ISSN
- 1351-0487 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8675
- OpenAlex
- W1507059208
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Constellations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
- Keywords
- boundary problem, democracy, political boundaries, territoriality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
