Cited by 47Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningAging and Gerontology Research

Proximal and Distal Defense: A New Perspective on Unconscious Motivation

Pyszczynski, Tom, Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon·2000·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Death-related thoughts produce different effects on thought and behavior when they are in current focal attention and when they are on the fringes of consciousness. When such thoughts are conscious, people attempt to either remove them from consciousness or push death into the distant future by distorting their beliefs to logically imply that they have many remaining years to live. When such thoughts are highly accessible but outside current focal attention, people increase efforts to view themselves as persons of value living in a meaningful universe. In this way, awareness of the inevitability of death produces diverse effects on human thought and behavior that bear little obvious resemblance to the problem of death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8721.00083

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Skidmore College (US)
Corresponding author
Pyszczynski, Tom
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2000-10
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
156-160
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2160236098
Cited by
47
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
death awareness, death-related thoughts, focal attention, belief distortion, meaning in life, self-worth, mortality salience, coping with death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review