The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arousal, Mood, and The Mozart Effect
Abstract
The “Mozart effect” refers to claims that people perform better on tests of spatial abilities after listening to music composed by Mozart. We examined whether the Mozart effect is a consequence of between-condition differences in arousal and mood. Participants completed a test of spatial abilities after listening to music or sitting in silence. The music was a Mozart sonata (a pleasant and energetic piece) for some participants and an Albinoni adagio (a slow, sad piece) for others. We also measured enjoyment, arousal, and mood. Performance on the spatial task was better following the music than the silence condition, but only for participants who heard Mozart. The two music selections also induced differential responding on the enjoyment, arousal, and mood measures. Moreover, when such differences were held constant by statistical means, the Mozart effect disappeared. These findings provide compelling evidence that the Mozart effect is an artifact of arousal and mood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529 · Cited by 2,270 · cited 2×
“Moreover, they influence cognitive performance in a nonmonotonic manner, and may be mediated by different neural pathways (Ashby et al., 1999).”
BackgroundAn opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0036128 · Cited by 1,704
Cited by
Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms
Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08005293 · Cited by 1,914
Schellenberg, E. G. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00711.x · Cited by 980
Self-citationJoint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children
Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.04.004 · Cited by 896
Exercising your brain: A review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning.
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2008) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0014345 · Cited by 660
The impact of background music on adult listeners: A meta-analysis
Kämpfe, J., Sedlmeier, P., & Renkewitz, F. (2011) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735610376261 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 248-251
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2127666976
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arousal, Mood, and The Mozart Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9280.00345
- The paper
- Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2001). Arousal, Mood, and The Mozart Effect. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.