Cited by 79Memory Processes and InfluencesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismCognitive Functions and Memory

Forward and Backward Recall: Different Response Time Patterns, Same Retrieval Order

Thomas, John G., Milner, Haley R., Haberlandt, Karl F.·2003·Psychological Science

Abstract

How do people retrieve information in forward and backward recall? To address this issue, we examined response times in directional recall as a function of serial position and list length. Participants memorized lists of four to six words and entered responses at the keyboard. Recall direction was postcued. Response times exhibited asymmetry in terms of direction. In forward recall, response times peaked at the first position, leveling off for subsequent positions. Response times were slower in backward recall than in forward recall and exhibited an inverse U-shaped function with an initial slowdown followed by a continuous speedup. These asymmetries have implications for theoretical models of retrieval in serial recall, including temporal-code, rule-based, and network models. The response time pattern suggests that forward recall proceeds in equal steps across positions, whereas backward recall involves repeated covert cycles of forward recall. Thus, retrieval in both directions involves a forward search.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.01437

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our findings mirror a well-studied effect in humans, wherein recall is harder in the backward direction than in the forward direction.

    “Indeed, our findings mirror a well-studied effect in humans, wherein recall is harder in the backward direction than in the forward direction (Clair-Thompson & Allen, 2013;Thomas et al., 2003;Bireta et al., 2010;Li & Lewandowsky, 1995;Guitard et al., 2019).”

    From The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A" (2023) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, J. G., Milner, H. R., & Haberlandt, K. F.
Affiliations
Trinity College
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2003-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
169-174
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2163836982
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
backward recall, serial recall, reaction time (psychology), serial position, list length, retrieval models, rule-based models, network models, forward search, word lists
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Practice, Psychological, Psychomotor Performance, Mental Recall, Serial Learning, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review