The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty
Open accessAbstract
In times of increased competition and globalization, project success becomes even more critical to business performance, and yet many projects still suffer delays, overruns, and even failure. Ironically, however, risk management tools and techniques, which have been developed to improve project success, are used too little, and many still wonder how helpful they are. In this paper we present the results of an empirical study devoted to this question. Based on data collected on over 100 projects performed in Israel in a variety of industries, we examine the extent of usage of some risk management practices, such as risk identification, probabilistic risk analysis, planning for uncertainty and trade‐off analysis, the difference in application across different types of projects, and their impact on various project success dimensions. Our findings suggest that risk management practices are still not widely used. Only a limited number of projects in our study have used any kind of risk management practices and many have only used some, but not all the available tools. When used, risk management practices seem to be working, and appear to be related to project success. We also found that risk management practices were more applicable to higher risk projects. The impact of risk management is mainly on better meeting time and budget goals and less on product performance and specification. In this case, we also found some differences according levels of technological uncertainty. Our conclusion is that risk management is still at its infancy and that at this time, more awareness to the application, training, tool development, and research on risk management is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success
Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00012-1 · Cited by 498
Self-citationDoes risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence
de Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2010) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002 · Cited by 332
Cradle-to-Cradle in Project Management: A Case Study
Ismayilova, A., & Silvius, G. (2021) · International Journal of Circular Economy and Waste Management · doi:10.4018/ijcewm.20210101.oa1 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Raz, T., Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-109
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W2113128719
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9310.00243
- The paper
- Raz, T., Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2002). Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.