The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology Adoption in the Presence of Constraints: the Case of Fertilizer Demand in Ethiopia
Open accessAbstract
Using a nationally representative dataset, and information on why farmers did not purchase fertilizer, the authors estimate a double–hurdle fertilizer adoption model for Ethiopia. Access is an overriding constraint in four zones. Credit is shown to be a major supply–side constraint, suggesting that household cash resources are generally insufficient to cover fertilizer purchases. On the demand side, household size, formal education of the farmer, and the value–to–cost ratio have the largest impact on adoption and intensity of fertilizer use. The results underline the importance of increasing the availability of credit, developing labor markets, and reducing the procurement, marketing and distribution costs of fertilizer. The authors conclude that current large–scale transport, health, and education investment programs will positively impact smallholder productivity and household welfare. The price sensitivity of farmers suggests that an urea subsidy could be useful in redressing the nutrient imbalance currently observed in Ethiopia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
Cragg, J. G. (1971) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1909582 · Cited by 2,600
Gragg, J. (1971) · Econometrica · Cited by 1,645
Peasant Household Behaviour with Missing Markets: Some Paradoxes Explained
de Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., & Sadoulet, E. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234892 · Cited by 1,439
FACTORS AFFECTING ADOPTION OF IMPROVED MAIZE SEED AND FERTILISER IN NORTHERN TANZANIA
Nkonya, E., Schroeder, T., & Norman, D. (1997) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.1997.tb01126.x · Cited by 284
Human Capital Productivity, and Labor Allocation in Rural Pakistan
Fafchamps, M., & Quisumbing, A. R. (1998) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.97040 · Cited by 147
An Empirical Analysis of Fertilizer Use in Pakistan
Coady, D. P. (1995) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2554904 · Cited by 68
Bank, W. (1998) · World Bank country study · doi:10.1596/0-8213-4314-9 · Cited by 8
Cited by
Ali, A., & Erenstein, O. (2017) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2016.12.001 · Cited by 671
Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010 · Cited by 594
“What is less well-documented with data from farmers’ fields is the relationship between input use intensity and farm size (important exceptions include Croppenstedt et al., 2003; Doss, 2003).”
BackgroundSelection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption
(2011) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta7749 · Cited by 543
Subsidies and Crowding Out: A Double‐Hurdle Model of Fertilizer Demand in Malawi
Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T. S., & Chirwa, E. (2011) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq122 · Cited by 402
Agriculture and development: A brief review of the literature
Dethier, J.-J., & Effenberger, A. (2012) · Economic Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.09.003 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Croppenstedt, A., Demeke, M., & Meschi, M. M.
- Venue
- Review of Development Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-70
- ISSN
- 1363-6669 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2076635538
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology Adoption in the Presence of Constraints: the Case of Fertilizer Demand in Ethiopia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9361.00175
- The paper
- Croppenstedt, A., Demeke, M., & Meschi, M. M. (2003). Technology Adoption in the Presence of Constraints: the Case of Fertilizer Demand in Ethiopia. Review of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.