Cited by 65Identity, Memory, and TherapyPsychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchPersonality Traits and Psychology

The spatial integration of adolescent identity: Its relation to age, education, and subjective well–being

Van Hoof, Anne, Raaijmakers, Quinten A. W.·2002·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

A sense of being the same person through time and social contexts is a central characteristic of identity formation. The spatial integration of identity was investigated in three groups of high school students differing in age and/or educational level. The 294 adolescents chose and ranked personally revealing identity contexts, described their general and context–specific identities, and indicated their subjective sense of well–being. With increasing age and educational level adolescents chose an increasing number of identity contexts. Context–specific identities were found on average to be closely interwoven. There was a positive linear relationship between spatial integration and subjective well–being. The conclusion is that age and education promote the extension of adolescents’ identity horizons, provided that their spatial integration is solid enough to absorb the downward effect of a new identity context. A comparison between spatial integration and two measures of exploration and commitment showed that spatial integration is a relatively powerful measure of adolescent identity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9450.00288

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Hoof, A., & Raaijmakers, Q. A. W.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
201-212
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2040158888
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
adolescent identity, identity integration, subjective well-being, age differences, educational attainment, identity exploration, identity commitment, high school students, identity construction
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Education, Humans, Human Development, Identification, Psychological, Netherlands, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review