Cited by 324Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsReligion, Society, and Development

Food Banks and Food Security: Welfare Reform, Human Rights and Social Policy. Lessons from Canada?

Riches, Graham·2002·Social Policy & Administration

Abstract

In the past twenty years food banks have established themselves as one of the fastest–growing charitable industries in first world societies. As institutionalized centres or clearing houses for the redistribution of donated and surplus food they have emerged as a key frontline response to the growing problem of food poverty and inequality. As welfare states have been restructured and cut back and basic entitlements have been denied, food banks have become secondary extensions of weakened social safety nets. This paper explores the growth of food banking in Canada and analyses its role in terms of advancing the human right to food, its effectiveness in achieving food security and the extent to which it contributes to, and/or counters the increasing emphasis by governments on welfare reform policies informed by neo–conservative ideology. Food banks are examined from the perspective of their origins and purposes, institutionalization, usage, food distributed and effectiveness. The rise of food banks in Canada is concrete evidence both of the breakdown of the social safety net and the commodification of social assistance. As such, they undermine the state’s obligation, as ratified in international conventions, to respect, protect and fulfil the human right to food. They enable governments to look the other way and neglect food poverty and nutritional health and well–being. A possible future role for food banks in countries where they are already established lies in public education and advocacy, but their institutionalization makes this seem an unlikely course. In countries where they are in their infancy, the question of whether to support their development should be a matter of urgent public debate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9515.00309

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riches, G.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Riches, Graham
Venue
Social Policy & Administration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
648-663
ISSN
  • 0144-5596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9515
OpenAlex
W2080471750
Cited by
324
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Policy and Administration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
Keywords
food banks, food security, food poverty, welfare reform, right to food, social safety nets, Canada, social policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review