Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ontology Matters: The Relational Materiality of Nature and Agro‐Food Studies

Goodman, David·2001·Sociologia Ruralis

Abstract

This paper examines the question of ontological choice in agro‐food studies, and emphasizes that such choices are consequential, determining analytical points of entry, arenas of theory and praxis, and normative positioning. These questions are explored by examining the privileged place of the labour process in the development of agro‐food studies and, as a more specific illustration, in analyses of agro‐biotechnology. It is suggested that the modernist ontological priorities embedded in the unreconstructed conceptualization of the labour process not only have been ignored but also have found an unexamined place in post‐structuralist agrarian political economy. The discussion closes by reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of actor‐network theory as an alternative avenue of critical engagement with the ‘new’ bio‐politics of agro‐food networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9523.00177

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Goodman, D.
Venue
Sociologia Ruralis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
182-200
ISSN
  • 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9523
OpenAlex
W2137047234
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
44.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontology Matters: The Relational Materiality of Nature and Agro‐Food Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9523.00177
The paper
Goodman, D. (2001). Ontology Matters: The Relational Materiality of Nature and Agro‐Food Studies. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00177

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.