The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture
Abstract
One of the most striking developments across the social sciences in the past decade has been the growth of research methods using visual materials. It is often suggested that this growth is somehow related to the increasing importance of visual images in contemporary social and cultural practice. However, the form of the relationship between ‘visual research methods’ and ‘contemporary visual culture’ has not yet been interrogated. This paper conducts such an interrogation, exploring the relation between ‘visual research methods’ – as they are constituted in quite particular ways by a growing number of handbooks, reviews, conference and journals – and contemporary visual culture – as characterized by discussions of ‘convergence culture’. The paper adopts a performative approach to ‘visual research methods’. It suggests that when they are used, ‘visual research methods’ create neither a ‘social’ articulated through culturally mediated images, nor a ‘research participant’ competency in using such images. Instead, the paper argues that the intersection of visual culture and ‘visual research methods’ should be located in their shared way of using images, since in both, images tend to be deployed much more as communicational tools than as representational texts. The paper concludes by placing this argument in the context of recent discussions about the production of sociological knowledge in the wider social field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide
Jenkins, H., & Plasencia, A. (2017) · Is the Universe a Hologram? · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262036016.003.0012 · Cited by 6,944
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research[1]
(2006) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640610666642 · Cited by 5,842
Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation
Harper, D. (2002) · Visual Studies · doi:10.1080/14725860220137345 · Cited by 3,966
(2009) · Cited by 3,529
Law, J. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203481141 · Cited by 3,106
Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 2,980
Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts
Austin, J. (1982) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(82)90228-3 · Cited by 2,883
Pink, S. (2007) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857025029 · Cited by 2,812
Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication
Forceville, C. J. (2011) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.013 · Cited by 2,771
Textual poachers : television fans & participatory culture
Jenkins, H. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,996
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, G.
- Venue
- The Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-46
- ISSN
- 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-954X
- OpenAlex
- W1913623206
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 44.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-954x.12109
- The paper
- Rose, G. (2014). On the Relation between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.12109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.