The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health inequalities, fundamental causes and power: towards the practice of good theory
Open accessAbstract
Reducing health inequalities remains a challenge for policy makers across the world. Beginning from Lewin’s famous dictum that “there is nothing as practical as a good theory”, this paper begins from an appreciative discussion of ‘fundamental cause theory’, emphasizing the elegance of its theoretical encapsulation of the challenge, the relevance of its critical focus for action, and its potential to support the practical mobilisation of knowledge in generating change. Moreover, it is argued that recent developments in the theory, provide an opportunity for further theoretical development focused more clearly on the concept of power (Dickie et al. 2015). A critical focus on power as the essential element in maintaining, increasing or reducing social and economic inequalities – including health inequalities – can both enhance the coherence of the theory, and also enhance the capacity to challenge the roots of health inequalities at different levels and scales. This paper provides an initial contribution by proposing a framework to help to identify the most important sources, forms and positions of power, as well as the social spaces in which they operate. Subsequent work could usefully test, elaborate and adapt this framework, or indeed ultimately replace it with something better, to help focus actions to reduce inequalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Various power mechanisms, including economic and knowledge-based ones, serve as channels for power inequity (6).”
From Bridging Sectors and Disciplines to Gain a Critical Understanding of the Eco-Social Determinants of Health Inequities: The ESDHI-EU Conference (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this regard, health inequities manifest broader systems of inequity shaped by sociopolitical power dynamics that systematically benefit elite groups over others.”
From Bridging Sectors and Disciplines to Gain a Critical Understanding of the Eco-Social Determinants of Health Inequities: The ESDHI-EU Conference (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health
Marmot, M. G., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A. J., & Taylor, S. A. J. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61690-6 · Cited by 8,473
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Lippa, N. C., & Sanderson, S. C. (2013) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000353712 · Cited by 6,095
Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2626958 · Cited by 5,722
Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy
Fraser, N. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315822174-11 · Cited by 5,475
Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy
Fraser, N. (1990) · Social Text · doi:10.2307/466240 · Cited by 5,147
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Arendt H., 1970, On violence
- Beeston C., 2013, Health inequalities policy review for the scottish ministerial task force on health inequalities
- Black D., 1988, Inequalities in health, 31
- Cornwall A., 2007, Spaces for change? The politics of participation in new democratic arenas, 1
- Dickie E., 2015, Power is a health and social justice issue
- Habermas J., 1975, Legitimation crisis front cover Habermas beacon press, 1975
- Hickey S., 2004, Participation – from tyranny to transformation
- Hunjan R., 2011, Power: A practical guide for facilitating social change
- Luttrell C., 2009, Understanding and operationalising empowerment
- Solar O., 2007, A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health discussion paper for the commission on social determinants of health
- Wright E.O., 2015, Understanding class
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What does the literature mean by social prescribing? A critical review using discourse analysis
Calderón‐Larrañaga, S., Greenhalgh, T., Finer, S., & Clinch, M. (2022) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13468 · Cited by 73
Intersectionality as a theoretical framework for researching health inequities in chronic pain
Macgregor, C., Walumbe, J., Tulle, E., Seenan, C., & Blane, D. (2023) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/20494637231188583 · Cited by 73
Dijkstra, I., & Horstman, K. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114263 · Cited by 44
Economic relationships and health inequalities: improving public health recommendations
Sayer, A., & McCartney, G. (2021) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.017 · Cited by 39
Self-citationKnowing the goal: an inclusive economy that can address the public health challenges of our time
Shipton, D., Sarica, S., Craig, N. J., McCartney, G., Katikireddi, S. V., Roy, G., McGregor, P., & Scobie, G. (2021) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2020-216070 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McCartney, G., Dickie, E., Escobar, O., & Collins, C.
- Affiliations
- Public Health Scotland (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of the Faroe Islands (FO)
- Corresponding author
- McCartney, Gerry
- Venue
- Sociology of Health & Illness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-11-22
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-39
- ISSN
- 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9566
- PMC
- PMC7894306
- OpenAlex
- W3107066117
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M003922/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- health disparities, fundamental cause theory, power, social determinants of health, social inequality, economic inequality, health policy, knowledge mobilization
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Status Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review