Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 778

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Being epileptic: coming to terms with stigma

Open access
Scambler, Graham, Hopkins, Anthony·1986·Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract

Most commentators on the stigma associated with epilepsy have assumed that the psycho‐social distress sufferers experience derives wholly or largely from the discriminatory attitudes and behaviour of normal people. This ‘orthodox viewpoint’ is assessed and found to be lacking in empirical support. A study of the impact of epilepsy upon the lives of sufferers is reported, special attention being paid to coping strategies developed in the family and at work. A distinction between ‘enacted’ and ‘felt’ stigma is introduced and utilized in the generation of a new model of people's responses to ‘being epileptic’ which appears to have more explanatory power than the orthodox viewpoint.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11346455

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 778

Metadata

Authors
Scambler, G., & Hopkins, A.
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
26-43
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
OpenAlex
W2038056968
Cited by
778
References
0
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Being epileptic: coming to terms with stigma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11346455
The paper
Scambler, G., & Hopkins, A. (1986). Being epileptic: coming to terms with stigma. Sociology of Health & Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11346455

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.