The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Tao of Textbooks: Taoism in Introductory World Religion Texts
Abstract
Despite an abundance of new pedagogical techniques and technological innovations, textbooks remain a vital part of education at the secondary and post‐secondary levels. Students generally accept the authority of their texts, at times believing them to be more reliable than the instructor. Consequently, we must be confident that the presentation of religious traditions is both accurate and balanced. This is particularly true for Taoism, which has become increasingly popular and popularized. Following up Russell Kirkland's Note from the Classroom in the June 1998 issue of this journal, “Teaching Taoism in the 1990s,” this study examines the coverage of Taoism in the thirteen most widely used Introductory World Religion textbooks. Through a quantitative analysis of the accounts, we can determine which texts give our students the most responsible description of a long misunderstood tradition. This review focuses on the amount of text devoted to (1) “religious” and “philosophical” Taoism, (2) the Tao Te Ching and Chuang Tzu, (3) quotations and sources, (4) Taoist schools, (5) women, and (6) morality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“major world religions textbooks substantially misrepresent your tradition, confining their study mostly to the Jewish part of your tradition, perhaps giving some attention to Eastern Orthodoxy, but generally ignoring Catholicism, the rise of Islam or the Protestant Reformation.”
From The Taoist Canon: A Historical Companion to the Daozang (2007) · cites this paper as Dippmann (2001)
Citations
Cited by
The Taoist Canon: A Historical Companion to the Daozang
(2007) · Religious Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1748-0922.2007.00138.x · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Dippmann, J.
- Affiliations
- Central Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dippmann, Jeffrey
- Venue
- Teaching Theology & Religion
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-54
- ISSN
- 1368-4868 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9647
- OpenAlex
- W2044564950
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching Theology & Religion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Education › Religious Education and Schools
- Keywords
- Daoism, Tao Te Ching, Zhuangzi
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Tao of Textbooks: Taoism in Introductory World Religion Texts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9647.00093
- The paper
- Dippmann, J. (2001). The Tao of Textbooks: Taoism in Introductory World Religion Texts. Teaching Theology & Religion. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9647.00093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.