The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shaping the Tourist’S Gaze: Representing Ethnic Difference in a Nepali Village
Abstract
A certain practice associated with the tourism industry in Nepal’s Chitwan district, the ‘village walk’, has become one way through which ethnic status can be expressed and claims to modernity made by local people. This phenomenon illustrates how globalizing processes reinforce the particulars of locality by providing people with new frameworks through which to interpret their societies. Thus, the ideology of modernity has replaced that of caste as the way in which Tharus and Brahmans in rural Nepal understand inter‐ethnic relationships. Foreign tourists serve as a foil for this reinterpretation through the practice of the village walk, in which high‐caste tourist guides conduct tourists on cultural tours of Tharu villages. The representation of Tharus as ‘primitive’, ‘jungly’, and living in another time meets both the desire of tourists for exotic experiences and that of high‐caste Nepalese who wish to represent themselves as belonging to the modern world from which the tourists presumably come.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“for Pharping - both at the local level, where ethnicity is one of a set of categories constantly used to classify others, and at the national level, where both the Royalist and Maobadi factions constantly deployed ethnic language in an attempt to garner support or assert control - ethnicity was assumed to be a useful and powerful category.”
From Collusion and bickering: landscape, religion and ethnicity in the central Himalayas (2010) · cites this paper as Guneratne 2001
In the citing paper
“Even where the interactions are contests about territory, as documented by Guneratne (2001, 535-536) in Chitwan or between Royalist and Maoist as described below, there is agreement about the landscape on one level at the same time as it is being riven apart on another.”
From Collusion and bickering: landscape, religion and ethnicity in the central Himalayas (2010) · cites this paper as Guneratne (2001, 535-536)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Collusion and bickering: landscape, religion and ethnicity in the central Himalayas
Tuladhar-Douglas, W. (2010) · Contemporary South Asia · doi:10.1080/09584935.2010.503267 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Guneratne, A.
- Affiliations
- Macalester College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guneratne, Arjun
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 527-543
- ISSN
- 1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9655
- OpenAlex
- W2069147603
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
- Keywords
- ethnic representation, Tharu, Brahman, caste, modernity, tourism, exoticism, tourist gaze, Chitwan, rural Nepal, interethnic relations, cultural tours
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review