Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Art and the Re‐Presentation of the Past

Tilley, Christopher, Hamilton, Sue, Bender, Barbara·2000·Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

Abstract

This article considers conceptual links between producing installation art works in the present and interpreting prehistoric lifeworlds. We consider connections between the work of contemporary ‘landscape’, ‘environmental’ or ‘ecological’ artists and an on‐going landscape archaeology project centred on Leskernick Hill, Bodmin Moor in the south‐west of Britain. We argue that the production of art works in the present can be a powerful means of interpreting the past in the present. Both the practices of interpreting the past and producing art result in the production of something new that transforms our understanding of place and space resulting in the creation of new meaning. Art and archaeology can act together dialectically to produce a novel conceptualization of the past and produce a means of relating to the past that is considerably more than the sum of its parts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9655.t01-1-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Tilley, C., Hamilton, S., & Bender, B.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
35-62
ISSN
  • 1359-0987
  • 1467-9655
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review