The relation between time spent reading and reading comprehension throughout the life course
Open accessAbstract
Background: In the present paper, we investigated the association between time spent reading and reading comprehension throughout the lifespan. According to the Matthew effect (or rich‐get‐richer and poor‐get‐poorer) model, interindividual differences in reading‐related skills between poor and average readers become wider as individuals grow older. Furthermore, the model states that these differences may be caused by different reading habits (i.e., the amount of time spent reading). Less competent readers tend to read less and therefore show less improvement in their reading skills. Competent readers tend to read more and therefore show greater improvement in their reading skills. Therefore, we propose that the correlation between time spent reading and reading comprehension should increase as people grow older. Method: To test this hypothesis, we analysed data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). We used data from four cohorts ( N = 28,795) with an age range from preadolescence (Grade 5) to later adulthood (>55 years). Results: Our results showed a medium‐sized correlation between leisure‐time reading and reading comprehension for students attending secondary school (β ~ 0.20). Contrary to our expectations, the correlations decreased with age and reached a stable low level (β ~ 0.07) in adulthood. However, for adults, occupation‐related reading predicted reading comprehension (β = 0.13–0.23). Conclusion: According to our results, reading should be viewed as a process that changes throughout the lifespan. Furthermore, results and implications from previous studies on the relation between time spent reading and reading skills from research conducted on school students might not be generalisable to adults. With respect to the results of the present study, we might restrict the validity of the Matthew effect in reading to school students and young adolescents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research has evidenced a strong positive relationship between leisure print reading habits and reading comprehension across the lifespan.
“Previous research has evidenced a strong positive relationship between leisure print reading habits and reading comprehension across the lifespan.”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Locher & Pfost, 2020
During secondary school, the relationship between reading habits and reading comprehension becomes more relevant, but it weakens as students grow older, reaching a stable level in adulthood.
“During secondary school, the relationship between reading habits and reading comprehension becomes more relevant, but it weakens as students grow older, reaching a stable level in adulthood.”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Locher and Pfost (2020)
The relationship between print reading habits and reading comprehension is not constant and may change across the lifespan.
“Through several longitudinal studies, it has been evidenced that such relationship is not constant and may change across the lifespan.”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Locher and Pfost (2020)
Locher and Pfost (2020) showed a medium-sized correlation between leisure reading habits and reading comprehension for secondary school students (β = 0.20; average age = 14.67), decreasing with age (β = -0.04 in college cohort; average age=24.77) and stable low in adulthood (β = 0.07; average age=50.74).
“The longitudinal study by Locher and Pfost (2020) showed a medium-sized correlation between leisure reading habits and reading comprehension for students attending secondary school ( β = 0.20; average age = 14.67), i.e., a sample from fifth to ninth grade. The correlations decreased with age ( β = - 0.04, in the college cohort; average age= 24.77) and reached a stable low level in adulthood ( β =”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Locher and Pfost (2020)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Locher, F., & Pfost, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bamberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Locher, Franziska
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Reading
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-77
- ISSN
- 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9817
- OpenAlex
- W2994331475
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Das Repository der Padagogischen Hoschule St. Gallen (Padagogischen Hoschule St. Gallen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PHSG #Proforis (St.Gallen University of Teacher Education) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PHIQ - das Repository der Pädagogischen Hochschule St.Gallen
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PF 840/2‐1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- reading comprehension, Matthew effect, reading habits, lifespan development, individual differences, high school students, adults, German National Educational Panel Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review