The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review and Discussion of Prospective Statistical Surveillance in Public Health
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A review of methods suggested in the literature for sequential detection of changes in public health surveillance data is presented. Many researchers have noted the need for prospective methods. In recent years there has been an increased interest in both the statistical and the epidemiological literature concerning this type of problem. However, most of the vast literature in public health monitoring deals with retrospective methods, especially spatial methods. Evaluations with respect to the statistical properties of interest for prospective surveillance are rare. The special aspects of prospective statistical surveillance and different ways of evaluating such methods are described. Attention is given to methods that include only the time domain as well as methods for detection where observations have a spatial structure. In the case of surveillance of a change in a Poisson process the likelihood ratio method and the Shiryaev–Roberts method are derived.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kulldorff, M. (1997) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929708831995 · Cited by 3,939
Summary of notifiable diseases--United States, 2002.
Groseclose, S. L., Brathwaite, W. S., Hall, P. A., Connor, F. J., Sharp, P., Anderson, W. J., Fagan, R. F., Javier, A. J., Jones, G. F., Nitschke, D. A., et al. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 1,338
Ширяев, А. Н. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,025
Optimal Stopping Times for Detecting Changes in Distributions
Moustakides, G. V. (1986) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176350164 · Cited by 1,020
On Optimum Methods in Quickest Detection Problems
Shiryaev, A. N. (1963) · Theory of Probability & Its Applications · doi:10.1137/1108002 · Cited by 839
Prospective Time Periodic Geographical Disease Surveillance Using a Scan Statistic
Kulldorff, M. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/1467-985x.00186 · Cited by 779
PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE IN THE UNITED STATES
THACKER, S. B., & BERKELMAN, R. L. (1988) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036021 · Cited by 767
Optimal Detection of a Change in Distribution
Pollak, M. (1985) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346587 · Cited by 581
Sequential Changepoint Detection in Quality Control and Dynamical Systems
Lai, T. L. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02052.x · Cited by 580
The Detection of Space-Time Interactions
Knox, E. G., & Bartlett, M. S. (1964) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2985220 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonesson, C., & Bock, D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-08
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-21
- ISSN
- 0964-1998 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-985X
- OpenAlex
- W2070539966
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review and Discussion of Prospective Statistical Surveillance in Public Health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-985x.00256
- The paper
- Sonesson, C., & Bock, D. (2003). A Review and Discussion of Prospective Statistical Surveillance in Public Health. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985x.00256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.