Cited by 91Survey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesCensus and Population EstimationSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Robust Models in Probability Sampling

Firth, D., Bennett, K. E.·1998·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Summary In the estimation of a population mean or total from a random sample, certain methods based on linear models are known to be automatically design consistent, regardless of how well the underlying model describes the population. A sufficient condition is identified for this type of robustness to model failure; the condition, which we call ‘internal bias calibration’, relates to the combination of a model and the method used to fit it. Included among the internally bias-calibrated models, in addition to the aforementioned linear models, are certain canonical link generalized linear models and nonparametric regressions constructed from them by a particular style of local likelihood fitting. Other models can often be made robust by using a suboptimal fitting method. Thus the class of model-based, but design consistent, analyses is enlarged to include more realistic models for certain types of survey variable such as binary indicators and counts. Particular applications discussed are the estimation of the size of a population subdomain, as arises in tax auditing for example, and the estimation of a bootstrap tail probability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9868.00105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 91

Authors
Firth, D., & Bennett, K. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • MRC Institute of Hearing Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Firth, D.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
3-21
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W2097672871
Cited by
91
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
robust estimation, design consistency, model misspecification, linear models, generalized linear models, local likelihood, nonparametric regression, population mean estimation, population total estimation, survey sampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review