The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dealing With Label Switching in Mixture Models
Abstract
Summary: In a Bayesian analysis of finite mixture models, parameter estimation and clustering are sometimes less straightforward than might be expected. In particular, the common practice of estimating parameters by their posterior mean, and summarizing joint posterior distributions by marginal distributions, often leads to nonsensical answers. This is due to the so-called ‘label switching’ problem, which is caused by symmetry in the likelihood of the model parameters. A frequent response to this problem is to remove the symmetry by using artificial identifiability constraints. We demonstrate that this fails in general to solve the problem, and we describe an alternative class of approaches, relabelling algorithms, which arise from attempting to minimize the posterior expected loss under a class of loss functions. We describe in detail one particularly simple and general relabelling algorithm and illustrate its success in dealing with the label switching problem on two examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14049 · Cited by 7,353
A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping
Wang, G., Sarkar, A., Carbonetto, P., & Stephens, M. (2020) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12388 · Cited by 1,121
Self-citationDepaoli, S. (2013) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0031609 · Cited by 147
Dirichlet process mixture models for unsupervised clustering of symptoms in Parkinson's disease
White, N., Johnson, H., Silburn, P., & Mengersen, K. (2012) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.710897 · Cited by 9
Sublinear regret for learning POMDPs
Xiong, Y., Chen, N., Gao, X., & Zhou, X. (2022) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13778 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephens, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 795-809
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2087101057
- Cited by
- 1,069
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.