The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Adaptive Estimation of Dimension Reduction Space
Abstract
Summary: Searching for an effective dimension reduction space is an important problem in regression, especially for high dimensional data. We propose an adaptive approach based on semiparametric models, which we call the (conditional) minimum average variance estimation (MAVE) method, within quite a general setting. The MAVE method has the following advantages. Most existing methods must undersmooth the nonparametric link function estimator to achieve a faster rate of consistency for the estimator of the parameters (than for that of the nonparametric function). In contrast, a faster consistency rate can be achieved by the MAVE method even without undersmoothing the nonparametric link function estimator. The MAVE method is applicable to a wide range of models, with fewer restrictions on the distribution of the covariates, to the extent that even time series can be included. Because of the faster rate of consistency for the parameter estimators, it is possible for us to estimate the dimension of the space consistently. The relationship of the MAVE method with other methods is also investigated. In particular, a simple outer product gradient estimator is proposed as an initial estimator. In addition to theoretical results, we demonstrate the efficacy of the MAVE method for high dimensional data sets through simulation. Two real data sets are analysed by using the MAVE approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,522
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 20,825
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 17,781
Cross validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions
Stone, M. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x · Cited by 10,881
Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications: Second Editon
Rao, C. R. (1973) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316436 · Cited by 10,489
Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications.
Robertson, C. A., & Rao, C. R. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529568 · Cited by 3,598
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013604 · Cited by 3,409
Root-N-Consistent Semiparametric Regression
Robinson, P. M. (1988) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912705 · Cited by 2,475
Friedman, J. H., & Stuetzle, W. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1981.10477729 · Cited by 2,216
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, Y., Tong, H., Li, W. K., & Zhu, L.-X.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-410
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2171050905
- Cited by
- 820
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Adaptive Estimation of Dimension Reduction Space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9868.03411
- The paper
- Xia, Y., Tong, H., Li, W. K., & Zhu, L.-X. (2002). An Adaptive Estimation of Dimension Reduction Space. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.03411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.