The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Effect of the Number of Quadrature Points in a Logistic Random Effects Model: An Example
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Although generalized linear mixed models are recognized to be of major practical importance, it is also known that they can be computationally demanding. The problem is the evaluation of the integral in calculating the marginalized likelihood. The straightforward method is based on the Gauss–Hermite technique, based on Gaussian quadrature points. Another approach is provided by the class of penalized quasi-likelihood methods. It is commonly believed that the Gauss–Hermite method works relatively well in simple situations but fails in more complicated structures. However, we present here a strikingly simple example of a logistic random-intercepts model in the context of a longitudinal clinical trial where the method gives valid results only for a high number of quadrature points (Q). As a consequence, this result warns the practitioner to examine routinely the dependence of the results on Q. The adaptive Gaussian quadrature, as implemented in the new SAS procedure NLMIXED, offered the solution to our problem. However, even the adaptive version of Gaussian quadrature needs careful handling to ensure convergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis
Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (1996) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/0169-2607(96)01720-8 · Cited by 408
Cited by
Generalized Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295939 · Cited by 831
A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models
Browne, W. J., & Draper, D. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117 · Cited by 603
Clinical Trial of Wellness Training: Health Promotion for Severely Mentally Ill Adults
Chafetz, L., White, M., Collins-Bride, G., Cooper, B. A., & Nickens, J. (2008) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e31817738de · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesaffre, E., & Spiessens, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-335
- ISSN
- 0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9876
- OpenAlex
- W2062978862
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Effect of the Number of Quadrature Points in a Logistic Random Effects Model: An Example. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9876.00237
- The paper
- Lesaffre, E., & Spiessens, B. (2001). On the Effect of the Number of Quadrature Points in a Logistic Random Effects Model: An Example. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.