Computer Ethics and Moral Methodology
Abstract
In computer ethics, as in other branches of applied ethics, the problem of the justification of moral judgment is still unresolved. I argue that the method which is referred to as “The Method of Wide Reflective Equilibrium” (WRE) offers the best solution to it. It does not fall victim to the false dilemma of having to choose either case‐based particularist or principle‐based universalist approaches to the problem of moral justification. I claim that WRE also provides the best model of practical moral reasoning available for computer ethics. It does not pretend to provide quasi‐algorithmic procedures for moral decision‐making, but neither does it abandon the regulative ideal of communicative transparency in discursive public justification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
'Fairness', 'dignity', and other such abstract concepts are examples of 'essentially contested concepts' which have many possible conflicting meanings requiring contextual interpretation through one's background political and philosophical beliefs.
“'Fairness', 'dignity', and other such abstract concepts are examples of 'essentially contested concepts' which have many possible conflicting meanings requiring contextual interpretation through one's background political and philosophical beliefs.”
From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 · Cited by 1,886 · see citing works
“Fairness, dignity and other such abstract concepts are examples of ‘essentially contested concepts’ with many possible conflicting meanings that require contextual interpretation through one’s background political and philosophical beliefs 46 .”
The uniqueness debate in computer ethics: What exactly is at issue, and why does it matter?
Tavani, H. T. (2002) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1023/a:1015283808882 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
AI Ethics – Too Principled to Fail?
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3391293 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Van Den Hoven, J.
- Venue
- Metaphilosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234-248
- ISSN
- 0026-1068 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9973
- OpenAlex
- W2099919863
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Metaphilosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- computer ethics, moral justification, wide reflective equilibrium, particularism, universalism, public justification, moral methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review