Evidence‐based Management: From Theory to Practice in Health Care
Open accessAbstract
The rise of evidence‐based clinical practice in health care has caused some people to start questioning how health care managers and policymakers make decisions, and what role evidence plays in the process. Though managers and policymakers have been quick to encourage clinicians to adopt an evidence‐based approach, they have been slower to apply the same ideas to their own practice. Yet, there is evidence that the same problems (of the underuse of effective interventions and the overuse of ineffective ones) are as widespread in health care management as they are in clinical practice. Because there are important differences between the culture, research base, and decision‐making processes of clinicians and managers, the ideas of evidence‐based practice, while relevant, need to be translated for management rather than simply transferred. The experience of the Center for Health Management Research (CHMR) is used to explore how to bring managers and researchers together and promote the use of evidence in managerial decision‐making. However, health care funders, health care organizations, research funders, and academic centers need wider and more concerted action to promote the development of evidence‐based managerial practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Health policy outcomes may actually be, to a varying extent, subjectively derived despite the positive intent of EBDM.
“Therefore, despite the positive intent of EBDM, health policy outcomes may actually be, to a varying extent, subjectively derived [22,23,33,40,45,61].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [40]
In “Research and Evidence,” the paper says managers may view research findings as subjective and context-dependent. “How Decisions Are Made” says managerial decisions can be shaped by stakeholders’ interests and political constraints, while the discussion on p. 429 extends the concern about evidence-based practice to health policy. These passages support the possibility of subjective influences on decisions, but do not establish that health policy outcomes themselves are subjectively derived. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- Abrahamson, E. 1996. Management Fashion. Academy of Management Review 21(1):254-85.
- Adelman, N., L. Chester, and K. Slack. 2000. The HSRProj Database: Update on Health Services Research in Progress. Health Affairs 19(4):257-8.
- Antman, E., J. Lau, B. Kupelnick, F. Mosteller, and I. Chalmers. 1992. A Comparison of the Result of Meta-analysis of Randomized Con- trolled Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts. Journal of the American Medical Association 268:240-8.
- Arndt, M., B. Bigelow, and H. Dorman. 1999. In Their Own Words: How Hospitals Present Corporate Restructuring in Their Annual Reports. Journal of Health Care Management 44(2):117-31.
- Axelsson, R. 1998. Towards an Evidence-based Health Care Man- agement. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 13:307-17.
- Bazerman, M. 1998. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 4th ed. New York: John Wiley.
- Black, N. 1997. A National Strategy for Research and Development: Lessons from England. Annual Review of Public Health 18:485-505.
- Blackler, F. 1995. Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies 16(6):1021- 46. 14680009, 2001, 3, · DOI
- Blumenthal, D., and N. Edwards. 2000. A Tale of Two Systems: The Changing Academic Health Center. Health Affairs 19(3):86-101.
- Blumenthal, D., and C.M. Kilo. 1998. A Report Card on Continuous Quality Improvement. Milbank Quarterly 76(4):625-48.
- Christensen, C. M., R. Bohmer, and J. Kenagy. 2000. Will Disruptive In- novations Cure Health Care? Harvard Business Review 78(5):102-12.
- Davidoff, F., B. Haynes, D. Sackett, and R. Smith. 1995. Evidence-based Medicine. British Medical Journal 310(6987):1085-6.
- Davies, H.T.O., and S. M. Nutley. 1999. The Rise and Rise of Evidence in Healthcare. Public Money and Management 19(1):9-16.
- Davies, H.T.O., S.M. Nutley, and P.C. Smith. 1999. What Works? The Role of Evidence in Public Sector Policy and Practice. Public Money and Management 19(1):3-5.
- De Long, D.W., and L. Fahey. 2000. Diagnosing Cultural Barriers to Knowledge Management. Academy of Management Executive 14(4):113-27.
- Dopson, S., L. Locock, D. Chambers, and J. Gabbay. 2001. Imple- mentation of Evidence-based Medicine: Evaluation of the PACE Programme. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 6(1):23-31.
- Drucker, P. 1998. The Profession of Management. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
- Dudley, R.A., K.L. Johansen, R. Brand, D.J. Rennie, and A. Milstein. 2000. Selective Referral to High-volume Hospitals: Estimating Potentially Avoidable Deaths. Journal of the American Medical Association 283(9):1159-66.
- Ferlie, E., M. Wood, and L. Fitzgerald. 1999. Some Limits to Evidence- based Medicine: A Case Study from Elective Orthopaedics. Quality in Health Care 8(2):99-107. 14680009, 2001, 3, · DOI
- Florin, D. 1996. Barriers to Evidence-based Policy. British Medical Journal 313:894-5.
- Freidson, E. 1980. Doctoring Together: A Study of Professional Social Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Freidson, E. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Freidson, E. 1994. Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Fulop, N., P. Allen, A. Clarke, and N. Black. 2001. From Health Tech- nology Assessment to Research on the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Addressing the Balance. Health Policy (in press).
- Guthrie, M.B. 1999. Challenges in Developing Physician Leadership and Management. Frontiers of Health Services Management 15(4):3-26.
- Halladay, M., and L. Bero. 2000. Implementing Evidence-based Healthcare. Public Money and Management 20(4):43-50.
- Harrison, S. 1998. The Politics of Evidence-based Medicine in the United Kingdom. Policy and Politics 26(1):15-31.
- Hewison, A. 1997. Evidence-based Medicine: What about Evidence- based Management? Journal of Nursing Management 5:195-8.
- Homa, P. 1998. What's Your Evidence? Health Management 2(6):18-21.
- Isham, G. 1999. Prospects for Radical Improvement: The National Guidelines Clearinghouse Project Debuts on the Internet. Healthplan 40(1):13-5.
- Ketley, D., and K.L. Woods. 1993. Impact of Clinical Trials on Clinical Practice: Example of Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Lancet 342(8876):891-4.
- Klein, R. 2000. From Evidence-based Medicine to Evidence-based Policy? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 5(2):65-6.
- Kovner, A.R., J.J. Elton, and J. Billings. 2000. Evidence-based Management. Frontiers of Health Services Management 16(4):3-46.
- Lomas, J. 2000. Using Linkage and Exchange to Move Research into Policy at a Canadian Foundation. Health Affairs 19(3):236-40.
- Luft, H.S., J.P. Bunker, and A.C. Enthoven. 1979. Should Operations Be Regionalized? The Empirical Relation between Surgical Volume and Mortality. New England Journal of Medicine 301(25):1364-9.
- Macintyre, S., I. Chalmers, R. Horton, and R. Smith. 2001. Using Evidence to Inform Health Policy: Case Study. British Medical Journal 322:222-5.
- Naylor, C.D. 1995. Grey Zones of Clinical Practice: Some Limits to Evidence-based Medicine. Lancet 345(8953):840-2.
- Nutley, S., and H.T.O. Davies. 2000. Making a Reality of Evidence- based Practice: Some Lessons from the Diffusion of Innovations. Public Money and Management 20(4):35-42.
- Perry, S., E. Gardner, and M. Thamer. 1997. The Status of Health Technology Assessment Worldwide: Results of an International Survey. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 13(1):81-98.
- Petticrew, M. 2001. Systematic Reviews from Astronomy to Zoology: Myths and Misconceptions. British Medical Journal 322:98-101.
- Popay, J., A. Rogers, and G. Williams. 1998. Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research. Qualitative Health Research 8(3):341-51.
- Richards, A., J. Carley, S. Jenkins-Clarke, and D.A. Richards. 2000. Skill-mix between Nurses and Doctors Working in Primary Care-Delegation or Allocation? A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 37:185-97.
- Richardson, G., A. Maynard, N. Cullum, and D. Kindig. 1998. Skill Mix Changes: Substitution or Service Development? Health Policy 45(2):119-32.
- Rogers, E. M. 1995. The Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
- Sackett, D.L., and W.M. Rosenberg. 1995. The Need for Evidence-based Medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 88(11):620-4.
- Schein, E.H. 1988. Organizational Socialization and the Profession of Management. Sloan Management Review 30(1):53-65.
- Sheldon, T., and I. Chalmers. 1994. The UK Cochrane Centre and the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: Respective Roles within the Information Systems Strategy of the NHS R&D Pro- gramme, Coordination and Principles Underlying Collaboration. Health Economics 3(3):201-3.
- Shepperd, S., and S. Iliffe. 1998. The Effectiveness of Hospital at Home Compared with In-patient Hospital Care: A Systematic Review. Journal of Public Health Medicine 20(3):344-50.
- Shortell, S.M., J.A. Alexander, P.P. Budetti, L.R. Burns, R.R. Gillies, T.M. Waters, and H.S. Zuckerman. 2001. Physician-System Integration: Introductory Overview. Medical Care (in press).
- Shortell, S.M., C.L. Bennett, and G.R. Byck. 1998. Assessing the Impact of Continuous Quality Improvement on Clinical Practice: What It Will Take to Accelerate Progress. Milbank Quarterly 76(4):593-624.
- Sitzia, J., and N. Wood. 1997. Patient Satisfaction: A Review of Issues and Concepts. Social Science and Medicine 45(12):1829-43.
- Staw, B., and L. Epstein. 2000. What Bandwagons Bring: Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Repu- tation, and CEO Pay. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3):523-56.
- Stewart, R. 1998. More Art than Science? Health Service Journal (26 March):28-9.
- Succi, M.J., and J.A. Alexander. 1999. Physician Involvement in Man- agement and Governance: The Moderating Effects of Staff Structure and Composition. Health Care Management Review 24(1):33-44.
- Swales, J. 1998. Research and Development in the NHS. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 91(36):Suppl. 18-20.
- Taylor, R., B. Reeves, P. Ewings, S. Binns, J. Keast, and R. Mears. 2000. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Critical Appraisal Skills Training for Clinicians. Medical Education 34(2):120-5.
- Tonelli, M.R. 1998. The Philosophical Limits of Evidence-based Medicine. Academic Medicine 73(12):1234-40.
- van Campen, C., H. Sixma, R.D. Friele, J.J. Kerssens, and L. Peters. 1995. Quality of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Review of Mea- suring Instruments. Medical Care Research and Review 52(1):109-33.
- Walston, S.L., and R.J. Bogue. 1999. The Effects of Reengineering: Fad or Competitive Factor? Journal of Healthcare Management 44(6):456-74. Acknowledgments: Our thanks to Chris Ham, Stephen Shortell, Jonathan Lomas, Anthony Kovner and two anonymous reviewers for many constructive sugges- tions for improvement on earlier drafts of this paper. At the time of writing, Kieran Walshe was a Harkness Fellow in Health Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He was supported by the Commonwealth Fund, a New York City-based private independent foundation. The views presented here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Commonwealth Fund, its
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Can Research Organizations More Effectively Transfer Research Knowledge to Decision Makers?
LAVIS, J. N., ROBERTSON, D., WOODSIDE, J. M., McLEOD, C. B., & ABELSON, J. (2003) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
Improving patient care by linking evidence-based medicine and evidence-based management.
Shortell, S. M., Rundall, T. G., & Hsu, J. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.6.673 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Bridging the gap: why, how and when HR analytics can impact organizational performance
McCartney, S., & Fu, N. (2022) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-12-2020-1581 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
McCaughey, D., & Bruning, N. S. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-39 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Shortell, S. M. (2004) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558704266768 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Atkins, D., Fink, K., & Slutsky, J. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_2-200506211-00002 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Kislov, R., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-64 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationRishworth, A., Dixon, J., Luginaah, I., Mkandawire, P., & Tampah Prince, C. (2016) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.018 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
How can primary care cross the quality chasm?
Solberg, L. I., Elward, K. S., Phillips, W. R., Gill, J. M., Swanson, G., Main, D. S., Yawn, B. P., Mold, J. W., Phillips, R. L., & for the Napcrg Committee on Advancing the Science of Family Medicine (2009) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.951 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Walshe, K., & Rundall, T. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Walshe, Kieran
- ORCID
- Walshe, Kieran
- Venue
- The Milbank Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429-457
- ISSN
- 0887-378X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0009
- PMC
- PMC2751196
- OpenAlex
- W2142959575
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 37.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Milbank Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- evidence-based management, health management, management decision-making, evidence-based practice, research utilization, health policy, research-practice translation
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Delivery of Health Care, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Research, United States, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review