The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taylorism, targets and the pursuit of quantity and quality by call centre management
Abstract
The paper locates the rise of the call centre within the context of the development of Taylorist methods and technological change in office work in general. Managerial utilisation of targets to impose and measure employees’ quantitative and qualitative performance is analysed in four case–study organisations. The paper concludes that call centre work reflects a pardigmic re–configuration of customer servicing operations, and that the continuing application of Taylorist methods appears likely.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The importance of situating organisational practices, such as management control and surveillance, within their historical context is underscored by the enduring influence of scientific management (see Bain et al. 2002;Conti and Warner 1993;Carter et al. 2011).”
From Reflections on Sociotechnical Change: New Directions for and Continuities in Research on New Technology, Work, and Employment (2026) · cites this paper as Bain et al. 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pope, C., Halford, S., Turnbull, J., Prichard, J., Calestani, M., & May, C. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-111 · Cited by 101
Between control and participation: The politics of algorithmic management
Krzywdzinski, M., Schneiß, D., & Sperling, A. (2025) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12293 · Cited by 74
Turnbull, J., Pope, C., Rowsell, A., Prichard, J., Halford, S., Jones, J., May, C., & Lattimer, V. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02030 · Cited by 22
Technology introduction on ships: The tension between safety and economic rationality
Bhardwaj, S., Bhattacharya, S., Tang, L., & Howell, K. E. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.025 · Cited by 19
Howcroft, D., Lucio, M. M., & Taylor, P. (2026) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.70049 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bain, P., Watson, A., Mulvey, G., Taylor, P., & Gall, G.
- Venue
- New Technology, Work and Employment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 170-185
- ISSN
- 0268-1072
- 1468-005X
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
