The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Liquidity-based Model of Security Design
Open accessAbstract
We consider the problem of the design and sale of a security backed by specified assets. Given access to higher-return investments, the issuer has an incentive to raise capital by securitizing part of these assets. At the time the security is issued, the issuer's or underwriter's private information regarding the payoff of the security may cause illiquidity, in the form of a downward-sloping demand curve for the security. The severity of this illiquidity depends upon the sensitivity of the value of the issued security to the issuer's private information. Thus, the security-design problem involves a tradeoff between the retention cost of holding cash flows not included in the security design, and the liquidity cost of including the cash flows and making the security design more sensitive to the issuer's private information. We characterize the optimal security design in several cases. We also demonstrate circumstances under which standard debt is optimal and show that the riskiness of the debt is increasing in the issuer's retention costs for assets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0 · Cited by 18,957
Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification
Townsend, R. M. (1979) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(79)90031-0 · Cited by 3,204
Cited by
Kaplan, S. N., & Stromberg, P. (2003) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00245 · Cited by 1,533
The Pooling and Tranching of Securities: A Model of Informed Intermediation
DeMarzo, P. M. (2005) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhi008 · Cited by 631
Self-citationRisk and Valuation of Collateralized Debt Obligations
Duffie, D., & Gârleanu, N. (2001) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v57.n1.2418 · Cited by 599
Self-citationProcyclical Leverage and Value-at-Risk
Adrian, T., & Shin, H. S. (2014) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hht068 · Cited by 555
Admati, A. R., DeMarzo, P. M., Hellwig, M. F., & Pfleiderer, P. C. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2349739 · Cited by 444
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Demarzo, P., & Duffie, D.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-99
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W2129881428
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Liquidity-based Model of Security Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-0262.00004
- The paper
- Demarzo, P., & Duffie, D. (1999). A Liquidity-based Model of Security Design. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.