The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prince and the Pauper? CEO Pay in the United States and United Kingdom
Abstract
We document differences in CEO pay and incentives in the United States and the United Kingdom for 1997. After controlling for size, sector and other firm and executive characteristics, CEOs in the US earn 45% higher cash compensation and 190% higher total compensation. The calculated effective ownership percentage in the US implies that the median CEO receives 1.48% of any increase in shareholder wealth compared to 0.25% in the UK. The differences, can be largely attributed to greater share option awards in the US arising from institutional and cultural differences between the two countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260062 · Cited by 29,074
Cited by
Are U.S. CEOs Paid More? New International Evidence
Fernandes, N., Ferreira, M. A., Matos, P., & Murphy, K. J. (2013) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs122 · Cited by 302
Self-citationThe New Community Firm: Employment, Governance and Management Reform in Japan
Inagami, T., & Whittaker, D. H. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488610 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Conyon, M. J., & Murphy, K. J.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 467
- Pages
- 640-671
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0297
- OpenAlex
- W2148145374
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 70.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.